Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30002949›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2018

High-Performance Virtual Reality Volume Rendering of Original Optical Coherence Tomography Point-Cloud Data Enhanced With Real-Time Ray Casting.

Peter M Maloca, J Emanuel Ramos de Carvalho, Tjebo Heeren, Pascal W Hasler, Faisal Mushtaq, Mark Mon-Williams, Hendrik P N Scholl, Konstantinos Balaskas, Catherine Egan, Adnan Tufail and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Ophthalmology: A Contemporary Prospective.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Peter M MalocaOCTlab, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
J Emanuel Ramos de CarvalhoMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Tjebo HeerenMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Pascal W HaslerOCTlab, Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Faisal MushtaqSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Mark Mon-WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Hendrik P N SchollInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel (IOB), Basel, Switzerland.
Konstantinos BalaskasMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Catherine EganMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Adnan TufailMoorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
Lilian WitthauerCenter for Medical Image Analysis & Navigation, University Basel, Switzerland.
Philippe C CattinCenter for Medical Image Analysis & Navigation, University Basel, Switzerland.
University College London · GBUniversity of Basel · CHMoorfields Eye Hospital · GBJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFeasibility testing of a novel volume renders technology to display optical coherence tomography data (OCT) in a virtual reality (VR) environment.

methodsA VR program was written in C++/OpenGL to import and display volumetric OCT data in real time with 180 frames per second using a high-end computer and a tethered head-mounted display. Following exposure, participants completed a Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) to assess for nausea, disorientation, and oculomotor disturbances. A user evaluation study of this software was conducted to explore the potential utility of this application.

resultsFifty-seven subjects completed the user testing (34 males and 23 females). Mean age was 48.5 years (range, 21-77 years). Mean acquired work experience of the 35 ophthalmologists (61.40%) included in the group was 15.46 years (range, 1-37 years). Twenty-nine participants were VR-naïve. The SSQ showed a mean total score of 5.8 (SD = 9.44) indicating that the system was well tolerated and produced minimal side effects. No difference was reported between VR-naïve participants and experienced users. Overall, immersed subjects reported an enjoyable VR-OCT presence effect.

conclusionsA usable and satisfying VR imaging technique was developed to display and interact with original OCT data. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: An advanced high-end VR image display method was successfully developed to provide new views and interactions in an ultra high-speed projected digital scenery using point-cloud OCT data. This represents the next generation of OCT image display technology and a new tool for patient engagement, medical education, professional training, and telecommunications.

Indexed as

meshophthalmologyoptical coherence tomographypoint cloud datapolygonray castingvirtual realityvolume rendering

Identifiers

PMID30002949
PMCPMC6038772
OpenAlexW2853199411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.