Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30002869›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018

Supporting prescribing in Irish primary care: protocol for a non-randomised pilot study of a general practice pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in primary care.

Karen Cardwell, B Clyne, F Moriarty, E Wallace, T Fahey, F Boland, L McCullagh, S Clarke, K Finnigan, M Daly and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Karen Cardwell1Health Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-5909-7439
B Clyne1Health Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland.
F Moriarty1Health Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland.
E Wallace1Health Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland.
T Fahey1Health Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland.
F Boland1Health Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland.
L McCullagh2Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
S Clarke3Health Service Executive Medicines Management Programme, Dublin, Ireland.
K Finnigan3Health Service Executive Medicines Management Programme, Dublin, Ireland.
M Daly3Health Service Executive Medicines Management Programme, Dublin, Ireland.
M Barry2Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
S M Smith1Health Research Board Centre for Primary Care Research, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St Stephen's Green, Dublin, Ireland.
General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing for patients taking multiple medicines (i.e. polypharmacy) is challenging for general practitioners (GPs). Limited evidence suggests that the integration of pharmacists into the general practice team could improve the management of these patients. The aim of this study is to develop and test an intervention involving pharmacists, working within GP practices, to optimise prescribing in Ireland, which has a mixed public and private primary healthcare system.

methodsThis non-randomised pilot study will use a mixed-methods approach. Four general practices will be purposively sampled and recruited. A pharmacist will join the practice team for 6 months. They will participate in the management of repeat prescribing and undertake medication reviews (which will address high-risk prescribing and potentially inappropriate prescribing, deprescribing and cost-effective and generic prescribing) with adult patients. Pharmacists will also provide prescribing advice regarding the use of preferred drugs, undertake clinical audits, join practice team meetings and facilitate practice-based education. Throughout the 6-month intervention period, anonymised practice-level medication (e.g. medication changes) and cost data will be collected. A nested Patient Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) study will be undertaken during months 4 and 5 of the 6-month intervention period to explore the impact of the intervention in older adults (aged ≥ 65 years). For this, a sub-set of 50 patients aged ≥ 65 years with significant polypharmacy (≥ 10 repeat medicines) will be recruited from each practice and invited to a medication review with the pharmacist. PROMs and healthcare utilisation data will be collected using patient questionnaires, and a 6-week follow-up review conducted. Acceptability of the intervention will be explored using pre- and post-intervention semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis will be undertaken and an economic evaluation conducted. DISCUSSION: This non-randomised pilot study will provide evidence regarding the feasibility and potential effectiveness of general practice-based pharmacists in Ireland and provide data on whether a randomised controlled trial of this intervention is indicated. It will also provide a deeper understanding as to how a pharmacist working as part of the general practice team will affect organisational processes and professional relationships in a mixed public and private primary healthcare system.

Identifiers

PMID30002869
PMCPMC6034254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.