Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30002744›Full record

ArticleWideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques2018

Is the laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer superior to open surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis on short-term surgical outcomes.

Piotr Małczak, Magdalena Mizera, Grzegorz Torbicz, Jan Witowski, Piotr Major, Magdalena Pisarska, Michał Wysocki, Marcin Strzałka, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Laparoscopic versus open liver resections of posterolateral liver segments - a systematic review and meta-analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of the learning curve of transanal total mesorectal excision: single-centre experience.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Transanal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis from China.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2019
    Article
  16. Defunctioning ileostomy and mechanical bowel preparation may contribute to development of low anterior resection syndrome.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Piotr Małczak2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena Mizera2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Grzegorz Torbicz2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Jan Witowski2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Piotr Major2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena Pisarska2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Michał Wysocki2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Marcin Strzałka2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Andrzej Budzyński2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Michał Pędziwiatr2Department of General Surgery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver the past years the incidence of colorectal cancers has increased worldwide. Currently it is the most common gastrointestinal malignancy worldwide. The laparoscopic approach has become the gold standard for surgical treatment. However, a recently published meta-analysis showed no difference in short- and long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopy for treating rectal cancer.

aimTo assess current literature on short-term outcomes of rectal cancer treatment using laparoscopic surgery in comparison to the open approach. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. The primary outcomes of interest were morbidity and short-term complications.

resultsWe identified 4,328 potential references. In the end we included 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We did not find any significant differences in terms of morbidity, haemorrhage, ureter injury, anastomotic leakage, mortality, intra-abdominal abscess or postoperative ileus. We found significant differences in the rate of surgical site infections, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay and time to first bowel movement.

conclusionsThis systematic review based on available RCTs confirms that laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery is associated with short-term outcomes comparable to the open approach. Moreover, in some aspects it provides better results (e.g. functional postoperative recovery, lower rate of surgical site infections (SSIs)). The quality of evidence is high; therefore in our opinion it is very unlikely that future trials will alter these results, and for this reason the laparoscopic approach can be considered the gold standard for the treatment of the majority of patients.

Indexed as

laparoscopyrectal cancershort-term outcomes

Identifiers

PMID30002744
PMCPMC6041579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.