Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30002732›Full record

ReviewJournal of foot and ankle research2018

Big issues for small feet: developmental, biomechanical and clinical narratives on children's footwear.

Stewart C Morrison, Carina Price, Juliet McClymont, Chris Nester

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of foot and ankle research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Respectful Children's Shoes: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stewart C Morrison1School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, 49 Darley Road, Eastbourne Campus, BN20 7UR UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0989-0903
Carina Price2Centre for Health Research, University of Salford, Salford, UK.
Juliet McClymont1School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, 49 Darley Road, Eastbourne Campus, BN20 7UR UK.
Chris Nester2Centre for Health Research, University of Salford, Salford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of footwear on the development of children's feet has been debated for many years and recent work from the developmental and biomechanical literature has challenged long-held views about footwear and the impact on foot development. This narrative review draws upon existing studies from developmental, biomechanical and clinical literature to explore the effects of footwear on the development of the foot. The emerging findings from this support the need for progress in [children's] footwear science and advance understanding of the interaction between the foot and shoe. Ensuring clear and credible messages inform practice requires a progressive evidence base but this remains big issue in children's footwear research.

Indexed as

ShoesBiomechanical PhenomenaChildFootHumansChildrenFoot developmentFootwearMaturationShoes

Identifiers

PMID30002732
PMCPMC6034280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.