ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2018
Comparison of ovarian responsiveness tests with outcome of assisted reproductive technology - a retrospective analysis.
Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment indicators of ovarian response during controlled ovarian stimulation: influencing factors and clinical value.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Should patients undergo endometrioma surgery before IVF/ICSI? a retrospective study with propensity score matching.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Ovarian endometriosis negatively impacts pregnancy outcomes in young infertile women undergoing IVF/ICSI treatment.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- β-Nicotinamide Mononucleotide Reduces Oxidative Stress and Improves Steroidogenesis in Granulosa Cells Associated with Sheep Prolificacy via Activating AMPK Pathway.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Predicting the ovarian response: towards a determinant model and implications for practice.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- The presence of ovarian endometrioma adversely affect ovarian reserve and response to stimulation but not oocyte quality or IVF/ICSI outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Article
- New findings in oligogenic inheritance of congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2022Article
- Thicker endometrium on hCG trigger day improves the live birth rate of fresh cleavage embryo transfer in GnRH-agonist regimen of normogonadotrophic women.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Observational
- Endometriosis and cumulative live birth rate after fresh and frozen IVF cycles with single embryo transfer in young women: no impact beyond reduced ovarian sensitivity-a case control study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study aims to compare the association between the most commonly used ovarian responsiveness markers - age, anti-Müllerian hormone levels (AMH), antral follicle count (AFC), ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) - and ovarian responsiveness to gonadotropin stimulation in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. MATERIAL AND
methodsPatients who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment using either a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or agonist protocol were enrolled in the study. Data of the patients were abstracted from the hospital's database. Tests were compared for total number of retrieved oocytes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, embryos, good quality embryos on day 1 and day 3, and ongoing pregnancies per cycle.
resultsThe OSI was the ovarian response test that had the strongest relationship with the ART outcomes. The level of association between the ovarian response tests and poor ovarian response data was (in descending order): OSI, ORPI, AFC, AMH, and age (AUC
conclusionsIn this study, which is the first study comparing the five most frequently used ovarian responsiveness markers and the second study signifying the role of OSI in an antagonist protocol, OSI was found to be more convenient to calculate, and it could be superior to other ovarian responsiveness markers for poor and high ovarian responses on cycles with agonist or antagonist protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.