Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30002697›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2018

Non-invasive evaluation of cardiac index by impedance cardiography in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Lidia Jureczko, Karolina Dobronska, Marcin Kolacz, Piotr Radziszewski, Piotr Dobronski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 74% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lidia Jureczkost Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Karolina Dobronskast Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Marcin Kolaczst Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr RadziszewskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr DobronskiDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPercutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is an endoscopic treatment of renal lithiasis. It is usually two-staged: it begins in the lithotomy position for ureteral catheter placement and retrograde pyelography, and subsequently an optimal renal access is obtained in the prone position. Some patients under epidural anesthesia do not tolerate the prone position and the PNL cannot be continued. This may be related to changes occurring within the circulatory system. The aim of this prospective randomized double-blind study was to evaluate the changes of the cardiac index (CI) during PNL. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn a group of 50 patients, with ASA physical status grade 1-2, epidural anesthesia with either 0.2% ropivacaine or 0.25% bupivacaine was performed and then the CI was evaluated by impedance cardiography.

resultsForty-five patients were included in the analysis; all tolerated the PNL well. After turning prone, a decrease in the CI was always recorded, a maximum after 10-15 min - 22.58 ±11.47%. There was significant variability of recorded values. The average CI dropped from 2.96 ±0.42 l/min/m

conclusionsA decrease in the CI was observed in every case, and it should be taken into consideration during qualification for PNL in the prone position.

Indexed as

epidural anesthesiaprone positionregional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID30002697
PMCPMC6040138
OpenAlexW2588581764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.