Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30002477›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Differences between microhabitat and broad-scale patterns of niche evolution in terrestrial salamanders.

Gentile Francesco Ficetola, Enrico Lunghi, Claudia Canedoli, Emilio Padoa-Schioppa, Roberta Pennati, Raoul Manenti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Inferring onAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  10. Monitoring of the Endangered Cave SalamanderAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gentile Francesco FicetolaUniversity Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire d'Écologie Alpine (LECA), F-38000, Grenoble, France. francesco.ficetola@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3414-5155
Enrico LunghiUniversität Trier Fachbereich VI, Campus I, Gebäude N Universitätsring 15, 54286, Trier, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4228-2750
Claudia CanedoliDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Emilio Padoa-SchioppaDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 1, 20126, Milano, Italy.
Roberta PennatiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 26, 20133, Milano, Italy.
Raoul ManentiDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 26, 20133, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which closely related species share similar niches remains highly debated. Ecological niches are increasingly analysed by combining distribution records with broad-scale climatic variables, but interactions between species and their environment often occur at fine scales. The idea that macroscale analyses correctly represent fine-scale processes relies on the assumption that average climatic variables are meaningful predictors of processes determining species persistence, but tests of this hypothesis are scarce. We compared broad- and fine-scale (microhabitat) approaches by analyzing the niches of European plethodontid salamanders. Both the microhabitat and the macroecological approaches identified niche differences among species, but the correspondence between micro- and macroecological niches was weak. When exploring niche evolution, the macroecological approach suggested a close relationship between niche and phylogenetic history, but this relationship did not emerge in fine-scale analyses. The apparent pattern of niche evolution emerging in broad-scale analyses likely was the by-product of related species having closely adjacent ranges. The environment actually experienced by most of animals is more heterogeneous than what is apparent from macro-scale predictors, and a better combination between macroecological and fine-grained data may be a key to obtain robust ecological generalizations.

Indexed as

BiodiversityBiological EvolutionAnimal DistributionAnimalsCaudataClimatePhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID30002477
PMCPMC6043550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.