ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2018
Acoustic Radiation Force Based Ultrasound Elasticity Imaging for Biomedical Applications.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Functionalized Gold Nanoprobes for Photoacoustic Imaging Analysis of Diseases.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Adipose tissue fibrosis: the unwanted houseguest invited by obesity.The Journal of endocrinology · 2023Review
- Visualizing tactile feedback: an overview of current technologies with a focus on ultrasound elastography.Frontiers in medical technology · 2023Review
- Advances in the clinical application of ultrasound elastography in uterine imaging.Insights into imaging · 2022Review
- The promising shadow of microbubble over medical sciences: from fighting wide scope of prevalence disease to cancer eradication.Journal of biomedical science · 2021Review
- Production of acoustic radiation force using ultrasound: methods and applications.Expert review of medical devices · 2018Review
- Real-Time Lossless Compression Algorithm for Ultrasound Data Using BL Universal Code.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathological changes in biological tissue are related to the changes in mechanical properties of biological tissue. Conventional medical screening tools such as ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography have failed to produce the elastic properties of biological tissues directly. Ultrasound elasticity imaging (UEI) has been proposed as a promising imaging tool to map the elastic parameters of soft tissues for the clinical diagnosis of various diseases include prostate, liver, breast, and thyroid gland. Existing UEI-based approaches can be classified into three groups: internal physiologic excitation, external excitation, and acoustic radiation force (ARF) excitation methods. Among these methods, ARF has become one of the most popular techniques for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of disease. This paper provides comprehensive information on the recently developed ARF-based UEI techniques and instruments for biomedical applications. The mechanical properties of soft tissue, ARF and displacement estimation methods, working principle and implementation instruments for each ARF-based UEI method are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.