Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30002298›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Understanding the Role of Anti-PEG Antibodies in the Complement Activation by Doxil in Vitro.

Barry W Neun, Yechezkel Barenholz, Janos Szebeni, Marina A Dobrovolskaia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Interplay between Liposomes and IgM: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Barry W NeunNanotechnology Characterization Lab, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. neunb@mail.nih.gov.
Yechezkel BarenholzMembrane and Liposome Research Lab, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, POB 12272, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel. chezyb@gmail.com.
Janos SzebeniNanomedicine Research and Education Center, Institute of Pathophysiology, Semmelweis University, 1089 Budapest, Hungary. jszebeni2@gmail.com.
Marina A DobrovolskaiaNanotechnology Characterization Lab, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702, USA. marina@mail.nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0002-4233-9227
Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infusion reactions (IRs) are common immune-mediated side effects in patients treated with a variety of drug products, including, but not limited to, nanotechnology formulations. The mechanism of IRs is not fully understood. One of the best studied mechanisms of IRs to nanomedicines is the complement activation. However, it is largely unknown why some patients develop reactions to nanomedicines while others do not, and why some nanoparticles are more reactogenic than others. One of the theories is that the pre-existing anti-polyethylene glycol (PEG) antibodies initiate the complement activation and IRs in patients. In this study, we investigated this hypothesis in the case of PEGylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil), which, when used in a clinical setting, is known to induce IRs; referred to as complement activation-related pseudoallergy (CARPA) in sensitive individuals. We conducted the study in vitro using plasma derived from C57BL/6 mice and twenty human donor volunteers. We used mouse plasma to test a library of well-characterized mouse monoclonal antibodies with different specificity and affinity to PEG as it relates to the complement activation by Doxil. We determined the levels of pre-existing polyclonal antibodies that bind to PEG, methoxy-PEG, and PEGylated liposomes in human plasma, and we also assessed complement activation by Doxil and concentrations of complement inhibitory factors H and I in these human plasma specimens. The affinity, specificity, and other characteristics of the human polyclonal antibodies are not known at this time. Our data demonstrate that under in vitro conditions, some anti-PEG antibodies contribute to the complement activation by Doxil. Such contribution, however, needs to be considered in the context of other factors, including, but not limited to, antibody class, type, clonality, epitope specificity, affinity, and titer. In addition, our data contribute to the knowledge base used to understand and improve nanomedicine safety.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalComplement ActivationComplement Inactivating AgentsPolyethylene GlycolsAnimalsComplement Factor HComplement Factor IDoxorubicinDrug HypersensitivityHumansMiceAntibodies, MonoclonalComplement Factor HComplement Factor IComplement Inactivating AgentsDoxorubicinliposomal doxorubicinPolyethylene Glycolsanti-PEG antibodyCARPAcomplement activationhypersensitivityimmunotoxicityinfusion reactionliposomesnanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID30002298
PMCPMC6100003
OpenAlexW2862652267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.