ReviewJournal of biosciences2018
Fluorescence spectroscopy for revealing mechanisms in biology: Strengths and pitfalls.
Review in Journal of biosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Delving into Membrane Heterogeneity Utilizing Fluorescence Lifetime Distribution Analysis.The Journal of membrane biology · 2022Review
- Site-directed fluorescence approaches to monitor the structural dynamics of proteins using intrinsic Trp and labeled with extrinsic fluorophores.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- Bacterial Luciferases fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Characterization of Two NMN Deamidase Mutants as Possible Probes for an NMN Biosensor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Experimental approach to study the effect of mutations on the protein folding pathway.PloS one · 2019Article
- Site-Directed Fluorescence Approaches for Dynamic Structural Biology of Membrane Peptides and Proteins.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article describes the basic principles of steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence. The formal equivalence of the two methodologies is described first, followed by the extra advantages of time-resolved methods in revealing population heterogeneity in complex systems encountered in biology. Several examples from the author's work are described in support of the above contention. Finally, several misinterpretations and pitfalls in the interpretation of fluorescence data and their remedy are described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30002272What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.