ReviewJournal of biosciences2018
Fluorescence techniques in developmental biology.
Review in Journal of biosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Calibrating Fluorescence Microscopy With 3D-Speckler (3D Fluorescence Speckle Analyzer).Bio-protocol · 2024Article
- Non-invasive single cell aptasensing in live cells and animals.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Current capabilities and future perspectives of FCS: super-resolution microscopy, machine learning, and in vivo applications.Communications biology · 2023Review
- Photonic Crystal Enhanced Fluorescence: A Review on Design Strategies and Applications.Micromachines · 2023Review
- Patterning principles of morphogen gradients.Open biology · 2022Review
- Toward dynamic, anisotropic, high-resolution, and functional measurement in the brain extracellular space.Neurophotonics · 2022Review
- Transcription factor dynamics in plants: Insights and technologies for in vivo imaging.Plant physiology · 2022Review
- One-Step Homogeneous Immunoassay for the Detection of Influenza Virus Using Switching Peptide and Graphene Quencher.Biochip journal · 2022Article
- Fluorescence-based techniques for the detection of the oligomeric status of proteins: implication in amyloidogenic diseases.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2021Review
- Dynamic High-Sensitivity Quantitation of Procollagen-I by Endogenous CRISPR-Cas9 NanoLuciferase Tagging.Cells · 2020Article
- Spatial Image Correlation Spectroscopy (ICS): A Technique for Average Size Determination of Subcellular Accumulated Structures from Fluorescence Microscopic Images.Bio-protocol · 2020Article
- Label-free optical imaging in developmental biology [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advanced fluorescence techniques, commonly known as the F-techniques, measure the kinetics and the interactions of biomolecules with high sensitivity and spatiotemporal resolution. Applications of the F-techniques, which were initially limited to cells, were further extended to study in vivo protein organization and dynamics in whole organisms. The integration of F-techniques with multi-photon microscopy and light-sheet microscopy widened their applications in the field of developmental biology. It became possible to penetrate the thick tissues of living organisms and obtain good signal-to-noise ratio with reduced photo-induced toxicity. In this review, we discuss the principle and the applications of the three most commonly used F-techniques in developmental biology: Fluorescence Recovery After Photo-bleaching (FRAP), Fo¨ rster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET), and Fluorescence Correlation and Cross-Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS and FCCS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
30002271W2807633658What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.