Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30002264›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosciences2018

Single-molecule photobleaching: Instrumentation and applications.

Simli Dey, Sudipta Maiti

Abstract read
PubMed
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Simli DeyTata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Colaba, Mumbai 400 005, India.
Sudipta Maiti
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule photobleaching (smPB) technique is a powerful tool for characterizing molecular assemblies. It can provide a direct measure of the number of monomers constituting a given oligomeric particle and generate the oligomer size distribution in a specimen. A major current application of this technique is in understanding protein aggregation, which is linked to many incurable diseases. Quantitative measurement of the size distribution of an aggregating protein in a physiological solution remains a difficult task, since techniques such as dynamic light scattering or fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) can provide an average size, but cannot accurately resolve the underlying size distribution. Here we describe the smPB method as implemented on a home-built total internal reflection fluorescence microscope (TIRF). We first describe the construction of a TIRF microscope, and then demonstrate the power of smPB by characterizing a solution of Amylin (hIAPP) oligomers, a 37-residue peptide whose aggregation is associated with Type II diabetes. We compare our results with FCS data obtained from the same specimen, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques.

Indexed as

Protein AggregatesFluorescence Recovery After PhotobleachingHumansIslet Amyloid PolypeptideKineticsPhotobleachingPolyvinyl AlcoholSolutionsSpectrometry, FluorescenceIslet Amyloid PolypeptidePolyvinyl AlcoholProtein AggregatesSolutions

Identifiers

PMID30002264
OpenAlexW2809761457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.