ArticleThe Journal of experimental medicine2018
Ca
Article in The Journal of experimental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondria: the key hub for hematopoietic stem cell homeostasis maintenance and fate determination.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- STIM2 is involved in the regulation of apoptosis and the cell cycle in normal and malignant monocytic cells.Molecular oncology · 2024Article
- Engineering of a bona fide light-operated calcium channel.Nature communications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment onCa2018
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this issue of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.