ArticleParasites & vectors2018
Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy and speed of kill of lotilaner (Credelio
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy and speed of kill of lotilaner (Credelio™) against Ctenocephalides felis on cats.Parasites & vectors · 2018Trial
- A randomized, controlled field study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner (Credelio™) in controlling fleas in client-owned cats in Europe.Parasites & vectors · 2018Trial
- A randomized, controlled field study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner (Credelio™) in controlling ticks in client-owned cats in Europe.Parasites & vectors · 2018Trial
- Laboratory evaluations of the immediate and sustained effectiveness of lotilaner (Credelio™) against three common species of ticks affecting dogs in Europe.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- A randomized, controlled field study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner flavored chewable tablets (Credelio™) in eliminating fleas in client-owned dogs in the USA.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- Laboratory evaluations of the immediate and sustained efficacy of lotilaner (Credelio™) against four common species of ticks affecting dogs in North America.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- Safety evaluation of lotilaner in dogs after oral administration as flavoured chewable tablets (Credelio™).Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- Two randomized, controlled studies to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner (Credelio™) in preventing Dermacentor reticulatus transmission of Babesia canis to dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2017Trial
- Efficacy of lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Oral lotilaner in 21 cats with naturally acquired harvest mite infestation.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Efficacy evaluation of lotilaner (Credelio™) in experimentally induced Otodectes cynotis infestations in cats.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Fluralaner injectable suspension (Bravecto® injectable) for dogs remains effective against Ixodes ricinus infestations for one-year.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Efficacy of lotilaner against myiasis caused by Cochliomyia hominivorax (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in naturally infested dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2023Article
- Lotilaner - a novel formulation for cats provides systemic tick and flea control.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Pharmacokinetics of lotilaner following a single oral or intravenous administration in cats.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Safety of lotilaner flavoured chewable tablets (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2018Article
- The intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics of lotilaner in dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2017Article
- Lotilaner - a novel systemic tick and flea control product for dogs.Parasites & vectors · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLotilaner, approved for dogs as a chewable tablet formulation, has separately been developed for oral use in cats (Credelio
methodsIn Studies 1 and 2, efficacy and safety were evaluated 48 h after treatment and post-treatment weekly infestations in 16 cats, against untreated controls, for 35 days. In Study 3, efficacy and safety were assessed in 8 lotilaner-treated cats until Day 35, before and after 24 h incubation of the female live ticks removed from the animals 12, 18 and 24 h after dosing and subsequent weekly infestations.
resultsEfficacy was > 99% on days 23 and 37, and 100% on all other timepoints in Study 1. In Study 2 it was > 98% on Days 9 and 37, and 100% on all other days. In Study 3, on Day 0, lotilaner was > 90% efficacious, pre- and post-incubation at all time-points. On Day 7, at 12 hours after infestation, efficacy was 100%, pre- and post-incubation. On Day 14, there was a 66.5% reduction in geometric mean live tick counts in treated cats compared to controls, increasing, after incubation, to 94.4%. Afterwards, efficacy decreased below 90% while tick counts in the treated groups remained significantly lower compared to controls. At 18 hours, lotilaner was ≥ 90% efficacious through Day 37, increasing to 100% at 24 hours, on all study days, with the exception of Day 28 (98.9 and 99.1% pre- and post-incubation, respectively). There were no treatment-related adverse events.
conclusionsAt the minimum dose rate of 6 mg/kg, lotilaner was efficacious against I. ricinus ticks. In addition, lotilaner was effective against this tick within 12 hours of treatment, reaching 100% efficacy within 24 hours. Lotilaner sustained a rapid kill of newly infesting I. ricinus through 35 days. By quickly killing ticks that infest cats, lotilaner has the potential to contribute to the reduction of tick-borne pathogens transmission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.