Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30001375›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of long-term survival data.

Xin Wang, Bobo Zheng, Xinlan Lu, Ruhai Bai, Linlin Feng, Quan Wang, Yan Zhao, Shuixiang He

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. New Opportunities for Minimizing Toxicity in Rectal Cancer Management.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Xin WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5585-073X
Bobo ZhengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xinlan LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Ruhai BaiGlobal Health Institute, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Linlin FengMedical Imaging Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Quan WangDigestive Disease Hospital, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yan ZhaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Shuixiang HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1832-1000
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNNorthwest Women's and Children's Hospital · CNSichuan University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe role of preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in rectal cancer treatment, when compared to long-course radiochemotherapy (LCRT), is still controversial. Thus the meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to evaluate the long-term survival of SCRT and LCRT as therapeutic regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer. MATERIAL AND

methodsPubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to August 2017 for eligible studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) of overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and local recurrence (LR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and TSA was applied.

results11 studies with 1984 patients were included. There was no significant difference in OS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.75-1.13, p = 0.44), DFS (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.79-1.12, p = 0.50) and LR (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.49-1.08, p = 0.11) between SCRT and LCRT groups. TSA suggested firm evidence for lacking on average a -10% relative risk reduction (RRR) in 4-year OS but no statistical significance in 4-year DFS.

conclusionsPreoperative SCRT is as effective as LCRT for locally advanced colorectal cancer in long-term survival. SCRT could be preferential while facing long waiting lists or lacking medical resource.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRectal NeoplasmsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID30001375
PMCPMC6042715
OpenAlexW2871789950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.