Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30001364›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Measuring bone stiffness using spherical indentation.

Oliver R Boughton, Shaocheng Ma, Sarah Zhao, Matthew Arnold, Angus Lewis, Ulrich Hansen, Justin P Cobb, Finn Giuliani, Richard L Abel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanical interplay between adipose tissues and disease progression.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Design andApplied materials today · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. 3D Imaging of Indentation Damage in Bone.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Oliver R BoughtonThe MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0098-1438
Shaocheng MaThe MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1221-4826
Sarah ZhaoThe MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5196-1563
Matthew ArnoldThe MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Angus LewisOrthopaedic Surgery Department, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Ulrich HansenThe Biomechanics Group, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Justin P CobbThe MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Finn GiulianiCentre for Advanced Structural Ceramics, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Richard L AbelThe MSk Lab, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

The Dunhill Medical Trust DMT/RCS602
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBone material properties are a major determinant of bone health in older age, both in terms of fracture risk and implant fixation, in orthopaedics and dentistry. Bone is an anisotropic and hierarchical material so its measured material properties depend upon the scale of metric used. The scale used should reflect the clinical problem, whether it is fracture risk, a whole bone problem, or implant stability, at the millimetre-scale. Indentation, an engineering technique involving pressing a hard-tipped material into another material with a known force, may be able to assess bone stiffness at the millimetre-scale (the apparent elastic modulus). We aimed to investigate whether spherical-tip indentation could reliably measure the apparent elastic modulus of human cortical bone. MATERIALS AND

methodsCortical bone samples were retrieved from the femoral necks of nineteen patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery (10 females, 9 males, mean age: 69 years). The samples underwent indentation using a 1.5 mm diameter, ruby, spherical indenter tip, with sixty indentations per patient sample, across six locations on the bone surfaces, with ten repeated indentations at each of the six locations. The samples then underwent mechanical compression testing. The repeatability of indentation measurements of elastic modulus was assessed using the co-efficient of repeatability and the correlation between the bone elastic modulus measured by indentation and compression testing was analysed by least-squares regression.

resultsIn total, 1140 indentations in total were performed. Indentation was found to be repeatable for indentations performed at the same locations on the bone samples with a mean co-efficient of repeatability of 0.4 GigaPascals (GPa), confidence interval (C.I): 0.33-0.42 GPa. There was variation in the indentation modulus results between different locations on the bone samples (mean co-efficient of repeatability: 3.1 GPa, C.I: 2.2-3.90 GPa). No clear correlation was observed between indentation and compression values of bone elastic modulus (r = 0.33, p = 0.17). The mean apparent elastic modulus obtained by spherical indentation was 9.9 GPa, the standard deviation for each indent cycle was 0.11 GPa, and the standard deviation between locations on the same sample was 1.01 GPa. The mean compression apparent elastic modulus was 4.42 GPa, standard deviation 1.02 GPa. DISCUSSION: Spherical-tip indentation was found to be a repeatable test for measuring the elastic modulus of human cortical bone, demonstrated by a low co-efficient of repeatability in this study. It could not, however, reliably predict cortical bone elastic modulus determined by platens compression testing in this study. This may be due to indentation only probing mechanical properties at the micro-scale while platens compression testing assesses millimetre length-scale properties. Improvements to the testing technique, including the use of a larger diameter spherical indenter tip, may improve the measurement of bone stiffness at the millimetre scale and should be investigated further.

Indexed as

Bone DensityAgedAged, 80 and overCortical BoneFemaleFemur HeadHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30001364
PMCPMC6042739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.