Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30001237›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2018

Uterine PEComas: A Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Analysis of 32 Tumors.

Jennifer A Bennett, Ana C Braga, Andre Pinto, Koen Van de Vijver, Kristine Cornejo, Anna Pesci, Lei Zhang, Vicente Morales-Oyarvide, Takako Kiyokawa, Gian Franco Zannoni and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Malignant uterine PEComa: a narrative literature review and challenging case report.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  9. An update on the role of SMARCA4 deficiency in gynecological neoplasms: how and where.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Diagnosis and grading of adrenal cortical carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. New histopathological and molecular findings in gynecological cancers.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. CD34-positive pleomorphic uterine sarcoma with NUDT3::RAD51B fusion.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

Jennifer A BennettDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington.
Ana C BragaDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Prof. Doutor Fernando Fonseca, EPE, Amadora, Portugal.
Andre PintoDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Koen Van de VijverDepartment of Pathology, Cancer Research Institute Ghent and University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Kristine CornejoDepartment of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester.
Anna PesciDepartment of Pathology, Sacred Heart Hospital, Negrar.
Lei ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Vicente Morales-OyarvideDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute.
Takako KiyokawaDepartment of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Gian Franco ZannoniDepartment of Pathology, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.
Joseph CarlsonDepartment of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute.
Tomas SlavikAmpath Private Pathology Laboratories and Department of Anatomical Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Carmen TornosDepartment of Pathology, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY.
Cristina R AntonescuDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Esther OlivaDepartment of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USCancer Research Institute Ghent · BEDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHospital Prof. Dr. Fernando Fonseca · PTJikei University School of Medicine · JPLahey Hospital and Medical Center · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMemorial Medical Center · USSacred Heart Hospital · IEUMass Memorial Medical Center · USUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
SPORE in Soft Tissue SarcomaP50CA140146 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI SPRIGGS, DAVID R · 2010 to 2014
$11.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA140146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are rare neoplasms that may show overlapping morphology and immunohistochemistry with uterine smooth muscle tumors. In this study, we evaluated the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of 32 PEComas, including 11 with aggressive behavior. Two distinct morphologies were observed: classic (n=30) and those with a lymphangioleiomyomatosis appearance (n=2). In the former, patients ranged from 32 to 77 (mean: 51) years and 13% had tuberous sclerosis. Tumors ranged from 0.2 to 17 (mean: 5.5) cm with 77% arising in the corpus. Epithelioid cells were present in 100% and a spindled component was seen in 37%. Nuclear atypia was low (53%), intermediate (17%), or high (30%). Mitoses ranged from 0 to 36 (mean: 6) and 0 to 133 (mean: 19) per 10 and 50 high-power fields, with atypical mitoses present in 30%. Thin and delicate vessels were noted in 100%, clear/eosinophilic and granular cytoplasm in 93%, stromal hyalinization in 73%, necrosis in 30%, and lymphovascular invasion in 10%. All tumors were positive for HMB-45, cathepsin K, and at least one muscle marker, with most expressing melan-A (77%) and/or MiTF (79%). A PSF-TFE3 fusion was identified in one while another showed a RAD51B-OPHN1 fusion. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 175 (mean: 41) months, with 63% of patients alive and well, 20% dead of disease, 13% alive with disease, and 3% dead from other causes. In the latter group (n=2), patients were 39 and 49 years old, one had tuberous sclerosis, while the other had pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Both tumors expressed HMB-45, cathepsin K, and muscle markers, but lacked TFE3 and RAD51B rearrangements. The 2 patients are currently alive and well. Application of gynecologic-specific criteria (≥4 features required for malignancy: size ≥5 cm, high-grade atypia, mitoses >1/50 high-power fields, necrosis, and lymphovascular invasion) for predicting outcome misclassified 36% (4/11) of aggressive tumors; thus, a modified algorithm with a threshold of 3 of these features is recommended to classify a PEComa as malignant.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEpithelioid CellsImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescencePerivascular Epithelioid Cell NeoplasmsUterine NeoplasmsAdultAgedBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGene FusionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedMitosisBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsRAD51B protein, humanTFE3 protein, humandiagnostic criteriaPEComaperivascular epithelioid cell tumorRAD51BTFE3tuberous sclerosisuterus

Identifiers

PMID30001237
PMCPMC6133752
OpenAlexW2883865472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.