Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30001205›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2018

Are ADC values of readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (RESOLVE) correlated with pathological prognostic factors in rectal adenocarcinoma?

Cui Tang, Mou-Bin Lin, Jin-Lei Xu, Lan-Hua Zhang, Xiao-Ming Zuo, Zhong-Shuai Zhang, Meng-Xiao Liu, Jin-Ming Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cui TangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji University Affiliated Yangpu Hospital, No. 450 Tengyue Road, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Mou-Bin LinDepartment of General Surgery, Tongji University Affiliated Yangpu Hospital, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Jin-Lei XuDepartment of Radiology, Tongji University Affiliated Yangpu Hospital, No. 450 Tengyue Road, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Lan-Hua ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji University Affiliated Yangpu Hospital, No. 450 Tengyue Road, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Xiao-Ming ZuoDepartment of Pathology, Tongji University Affiliated Yangpu Hospital, Shanghai, 200090, China.
Zhong-Shuai ZhangSIEMENS Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Meng-Xiao LiuSIEMENS Healthineers Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Jin-Ming XuDepartment of Radiology, Tongji University Affiliated Yangpu Hospital, No. 450 Tengyue Road, Shanghai, 200090, China. xululu450@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4033-1851
Yangpu Hospital of Tongji University · CNSiemens (China) · CN

Funding

Project of Science and Technology Commission and National Health and Family Planning Commission in Yanpu District of Shanghai YP15Q07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values as imaging biomarkers of rectal cancer are currently a hot research spot. The use of ADC values for preoperative judgment of pathological features in rectal cancer has been generally accepted. The image quality evaluation of conventional diffusion is severe deformation, and the measurement of ADC values can easily lead to bias. Readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (RESOLVE) provides high signal-to-noise ratio images and significantly reduces distortions caused by magnetosensitive effects. The purpose of this study was to explore the correlations between ADC values of RESOLVE and pathological prognostic factors in rectal adenocarcinoma.

methodsWe collected pathological data of 89 patients with pathologically confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma who directly underwent surgical resection without receiving adjuvant therapy. The patients were grouped according to the pathologic type, gross classification, degree of differentiation, TN stage, and immunohistochemical expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

resultsRESOLVE ADC values of rectal cancer were measured at b = 800, and correlations between the RESOLVE ADC values obtained in different groups were analysed. We found that RESOLVE ADC values in the ulcer-type group were significantly higher than those in the eminence-type group.

conclusionRESOLVE ADC values in different pathologic types of rectal cancer were significantly different. RESOLVE ADC values in the EGFR-positive group were significantly lower than those in the EGFR-negative group. There was no significant difference in RESOLVE ADC values between different degrees of pathologic differentiation, TN stages, and positive or negative lymph nodes. The quantitative description of RESOLVE ADC values could be used to assess the biological behaviour of rectal adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsApparent diffusion coefficientMRIPathologyPrognosisRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID30001205
PMCPMC6043992
OpenAlexW2820242297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.