Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30001203›Full record

ReviewNeural development2018

Does experience provide a permissive or instructive influence on the development of direction selectivity in visual cortex?

Arani Roy, Ian K Christie, Gina M Escobar, Jason J Osik, Marjena Popović, Neil J Ritter, Andrea K Stacy, Shen Wang, Jozsef Fiser, Paul Miller and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural development, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The Ferret as a Model System for Neocortex Development and Evolution.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arani RoyDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Ian K ChristieDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Gina M EscobarDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Jason J OsikDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Marjena PopovićDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Neil J RitterDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Andrea K StacyDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Shen WangDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Jozsef FiserVolen Center for Complex Systems, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Paul MillerDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA.
Stephen D Van HooserDepartment of Biology, Brandeis University, 415 South St. MS008, Waltham, MA, 02454, USA. vanhoosr@brandeis.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1112-5832
Brandeis University · US

Funding

NEUROSCIENCE: FROM CHANNELS TO BEHAVIORT32MH019929 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI GRIFFITH, LESLIE C · 1994 to 2023
$8.5M
Circuit mechanisms underlying experience-dependent developmentR01EY022122 · NEI · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI VAN HOOSER, STEPHEN D · 2013 to 2022
$3.8M
Undergraduate and Graduate Training in Computational Neuroscience R90DA033463 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, PAUL · 2011 to 2020
$2.0M
Undergraduate and Graduate Training in Computational NeuroscienceT90DA032435 · NIDA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, PAUL · 2011 to 2020
$1.6M
Directorate for Biological Sciences 1120938NEI NIH HHS EY022122NIDA NIH HHS R90 DA033463NIDA NIH HHS T90 DA032435NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In principle, the development of sensory receptive fields in cortex could arise from experience-independent mechanisms that have been acquired through evolution, or through an online analysis of the sensory experience of the individual animal. Here we review recent experiments that suggest that the development of direction selectivity in carnivore visual cortex requires experience, but also suggest that the experience of an individual animal cannot greatly influence the parameters of the direction tuning that emerges, including direction angle preference and speed tuning. The direction angle preference that a neuron will acquire can be predicted from small initial biases that are present in the naïve cortex prior to the onset of visual experience. Further, experience with stimuli that move at slow or fast speeds does not alter the speed tuning properties of direction-selective neurons, suggesting that speed tuning preferences are built in. Finally, unpatterned optogenetic activation of the cortex over a period of a few hours is sufficient to produce the rapid emergence of direction selectivity in the naïve ferret cortex, suggesting that information about the direction angle preference that cells will acquire must already be present in the cortical circuit prior to experience. These results are consistent with the idea that experience has a permissive influence on the development of direction selectivity.

Indexed as

AnimalsChoice BehaviorMotion PerceptionNeuronsOrientationPhotic StimulationVisual CortexArea 17DevelopmentMotionStriate cortexThalamocortical

Identifiers

PMID30001203
PMCPMC6044012
OpenAlexW2846952658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.