Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29999214›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of health psychology2019

Developing and testing a web-based intervention to encourage early help-seeking in people with symptoms associated with lung cancer.

Julia Mueller, Alan Davies, Caroline Jay, Simon Harper, Fiona Blackhall, Yvonne Summers, Amelie Harle, Chris Todd

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of health psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia MuellerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4939-7112
Alan DaviesSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5737-5629
Caroline JaySchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6080-1382
Simon HarperSchool of Computer Science, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9301-5049
Fiona BlackhallManchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8716-3395
Yvonne SummersManchester Academic Health Science Centre, UK.
Amelie HarleDepartment of Medical Oncology, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Chris ToddSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6645-4505
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBPoole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council 1354978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo detail the development method used to produce an online, tailored, theory-based, user-centred intervention to encourage help-seeking for potential lung cancer symptoms.

designIntervention development was structured around the person-based approach. The feasibility study involved a randomized controlled trial design.

methodsIntervention development drew on qualitative inquiries, the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), and identifying concrete mechanisms of change to implement in the intervention (Behaviour Change Techniques). The final intervention involved two key features: (1) tailoring and (2) 'TPB components' to target beliefs about help-seeking. In an online feasibility study, we recruited people reporting potential lung cancer symptoms using mailing lists, social media, websites, and Google AdWords. Participants were randomized to the intervention, a tailored comparison group (CG) without TPB-components, an untailored CG with TPB components, or a CG with neither. Following treatment, participants clicked a button to indicate whether they wished to make an appointment and completed a TPB questionnaire.

resultsA total of 130 participants reporting relevant symptoms were recruited (24% of website visitors). Participants in the intervention group reported higher intention to seek help than those who received tailored information without TPB components (p = .03). User comments indicate more support is needed for people who sought help for symptoms, but felt dismissed.

conclusionsThe potential for differential dropout in online randomized trials requires careful consideration. Future help-seeking interventions should provide support for those who have previously felt dismissed by health professionals. The feasibility study provides some evidence that our 'TPB components' were effective, but validation in a powered trial is necessary. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? People with lung cancer often delay presenting symptoms to health services. Some patients (or their family/friends) look up symptoms online before their diagnosis, to decide whether they should see a doctor. Interventions are needed to ensure people can find useful information online that will encourage them to seek help for relevant symptoms. What does this study add? Theory-mapping and user involvement facilitated systematic intervention development. Lung cancer help-seeking interventions should address salient beliefs and personal relevance. The potential for differential dropout in online randomized trials requires careful consideration.

Indexed as

Help-Seeking BehaviorInternetLung NeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehavior TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedPsychological Theorybehaviour change techniquesdigital healthhealth information seekinghelp-seeking behaviourlung canceronline health informationtailoringtheory of planned behaviourweb-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID29999214
PMCPMC6492236
OpenAlexW2881427039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.