ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2018
CyberKnife
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of scintillation and Cherenkov imaging as beam shape verification method in CyberKnife® radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Feasibility of patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) for real-time robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) based on tumor motion traces.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Article
- Radioluminescence imaging feasibility for robotic radiosurgery field size quality assurance.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Implementing and evaluating a high-resolution diode array for patient-specific quality assurance of robotic brain stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2022Article
- Small field output correction factors of the microSilicon detector and a deeper understanding of their origin by quantifying perturbation factors.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Article
- Small-field dosimetry of TrueBeamJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Article
- Two-dimensional solid-state array detectors: A technique for in vivo dose verification in a variable effective area.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2019Article
- Evaluation of NanoDot Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter for Cone-shaped Small-field Dosimetry of Cyberknife Stereotactic Radiosurgery Unit: A Monte Carlo Simulation and Dosimetric Verification Study.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe challenges of accurate dosimetry for stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with small unflattened radiation fields have been widely reported in the literature. In this case, suitable dosimeters would have to offer a submillimeter spatial resolution. The CyberKnife
methodsA 2D monolithic silicon array detector, the "Octa", was evaluated for dosimetric quality assurance (QA) for a CyberKnife system. OFs, DPs, percentage depth-dose (PDD) and tissue maximum ratio (TMR) were investigated, and results were benchmarked against the PTW SRS diode. Cross-plane, in-plane and 2 diagonal dose profiles were measured simultaneously with high spatial resolution (0.3 mm). Monte Carlo (MC) simulations with a GEANT4 (GEometry ANd Tracking 4) tool-kit were added to the study to support the experimental characterization of the detector response.
resultsFor fixed cones and the Iris, for all field sizes investigated in the range between 5 and 60 mm diameter, OFs, PDDs, TMRs, and DPs in terms of FWHM measured by the Octa were accurate within 3% when benchmarked against the SRS diode and MC calculations.
conclusionsThe Octa was shown to be an accurate dosimeter for measurements with a 6 MV FFF beam delivered with a CyberKnife system. The detector enabled real-time dosimetric verification for the variable aperture Iris collimator, yielding OFs and DPs consistent with those obtained with alternative methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.