Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29998430›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2019

Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Utilization of Infertility Services: A Focus on American Indian/Alaska Natives.

Amanda E Janitz, Jennifer D Peck, LaTasha B Craig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. GYNs at the REI gates: unsolvable conundrum or unambiguous opportunity?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda E JanitzDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 801 NE 13th St., CHB 309, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. amanda-janitz@ouhsc.edu.
Jennifer D PeckDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 801 NE 13th St., CHB 309, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
LaTasha B CraigSection of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 840 Research Parkway, Suite 200, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI Janis E Campbell · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
Addressing Health Disparities among Oklahoma Minority and Rural Communities through Clinical Research Education and Career DevelopmentR25MD011564 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI HOUCHEN, COURTNEY WAYNE, STAVRAKIS, STAVROS · 2017 to 2021
$2.7M
Maternal and Child Health Bureau 1 R40MC29449-01-00National Institute of General Medical Sciences U54 GM104938NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938NIMHD NIH HHS R25 MD011564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives Previous studies have identified racial/ethnic disparities in infertility care, but patterns among American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) have not been reported. Our objective was to evaluate infertility services use in the US by race/ethnicity using data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods We analyzed female respondent data from the pooled NSFG cycles 2002, 2006-2010 and 2011-2013. Respondents reported use of infertility services and types of services. We calculated weighted crude and adjusted prevalence proportion ratios (PPR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using modified Poisson regression with robust error variances accounting for the complex survey design to compare infertility services use across race/ethnicities. Results Overall, 8.7% of women reported using medical services to get pregnant. The prevalence of using any medical service to help get pregnant was lower for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) (PPR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.43-0.83) and black (PPR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.63) compared to white women and in Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic women (PPR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.67). The prevalence of accessing treatment, testing, and advice also differed by race and ethnicity. Conclusions for Practice We observed disparities in accessing services to get pregnant among AI/AN and black women and reduced use of advice among Asian/Pacific Islanders compared to whites. We also observed reduced service utilization for Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic women. Differential utilization of specific services suggests barriers to infertility care may contribute to reproductive health disparities among underserved populations.

Indexed as

American Indian or Alaska NativeHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityInfertilityPopulation SurveillanceReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth ServicesHumansPregnancyUnited StatesEthnicityIndians, North AmericanInfertilityRaceServices

Identifiers

PMID29998430
PMCPMC6329668
OpenAlexW2846052001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.