ArticleMaternal and child health journal2019
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Utilization of Infertility Services: A Focus on American Indian/Alaska Natives.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between social and economic determinants of health and receiving infertility care among female Veterans: a cross-sectional study.F&S reports · 2026Article
- How far is the clinic? Urbanicity and sociodemographic variation in the distance to assisted reproductive technology clinics in the USA.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Male Factor Infertility and the Rural-Urban Continuum.Urology · 2025Article
- GYNs at the REI gates: unsolvable conundrum or unambiguous opportunity?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Racial/ethnic disparity in severe maternal morbidity among women who conceived by in vitro fertilization.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Anticipating in vitro gametogenesis: Hopes and concerns for IVG among diverse stakeholders.Stem cell reports · 2024Article
- Moving toward Narrowing the United States Gap in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Next Decade.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Inequities in Medically Assisted Reproduction: a Scoping Review.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Article
- Inequity of Access: Scoping the Barriers to Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Geographic distribution of assisted reproductive technology clinics in the USA: a multilevel sociodemographic analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Article
- Self-reported barriers to accessing infertility care: patient perspectives from urban gynecology clinics.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Assisted reproductive technology use in the United States: a population assessment.Fertility and sterility · 2019Article
- Race and Length of Time Pursuing Pregnancy Among Women Who Utilized Medical Help to Get Pregnant.Journal of family & reproductive health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives Previous studies have identified racial/ethnic disparities in infertility care, but patterns among American Indian/Alaska Natives (AI/AN) have not been reported. Our objective was to evaluate infertility services use in the US by race/ethnicity using data from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Methods We analyzed female respondent data from the pooled NSFG cycles 2002, 2006-2010 and 2011-2013. Respondents reported use of infertility services and types of services. We calculated weighted crude and adjusted prevalence proportion ratios (PPR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using modified Poisson regression with robust error variances accounting for the complex survey design to compare infertility services use across race/ethnicities. Results Overall, 8.7% of women reported using medical services to get pregnant. The prevalence of using any medical service to help get pregnant was lower for American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) (PPR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.43-0.83) and black (PPR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.63) compared to white women and in Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic women (PPR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.67). The prevalence of accessing treatment, testing, and advice also differed by race and ethnicity. Conclusions for Practice We observed disparities in accessing services to get pregnant among AI/AN and black women and reduced use of advice among Asian/Pacific Islanders compared to whites. We also observed reduced service utilization for Hispanic compared to non-Hispanic women. Differential utilization of specific services suggests barriers to infertility care may contribute to reproductive health disparities among underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.