Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29998396›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Gliomatosis cerebri: a consensus summary report from the Second International Gliomatosis cerebri Group Meeting, June 22-23, 2017, Bethesda, USA.

Andres Morales La Madrid, Surabhi Ranjan, Katherine E Warren

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) or GC-like? A picture to be reconsidered in neuro-oncology based on large retrospective analysis of GC series.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andres Morales La MadridPediatric Neuro-Oncology Unit, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain.
Surabhi RanjanNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Katherine E WarrenPediatric-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. warrenk@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Early Clinical Trials for Children with CNS TumorsZIABC011447 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2012 to 2019
$2.1M
Investigating the biology of pediatric gliomasZIABC011514 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2013 to 2019
$958k
Imaging characteristics of Diffuse Pontine Gliomas after Radiation TherapyZ01BC010589 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2005 to 2008
$288k
Evaluation of the Natural History of Patients with Tumors of the Central NervousZ01BC010586 · NCI · BASIC SCIENCES · PI WARREN, KATHERINE E · 2005 to 2007
$164k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010586Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010589Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011447Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC011514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) is an aggressive glioma characterized by an invasive growth pattern and a dismal prognosis. The low incidence and non-specific symptoms at presentation pose unique challenges for early diagnosis and disease-specific research. There is no standard of care for the treatment of patients with a GC phenotype. Understanding the biology of this entity is a critical step in determining effective treatments. Toward this end, the Second International GC Group convened at National Institutes of Health, Bethesda on June 22nd-23rd 2017. This paper summarizes the main conclusions and recommendations for research priorities to fight this fatal condition.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeoplasms, NeuroepithelialEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)PrognosisUnited StatesConsensusGliomatosis cerebriMeetingSecond International Gliomatosis cerebri Meeting 2017

Identifiers

PMID29998396
PMCPMC6301002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.