Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29998338›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2018

Effect of Acupuncture vs Sham Acupuncture or Waitlist Control on Joint Pain Related to Aromatase Inhibitors Among Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Dawn L Hershman, Joseph M Unger, Heather Greenlee, Jillian L Capodice, Danika L Lew, Amy K Darke, Alice T Kengla, Marianne K Melnik, Carla W Jorgensen, William H Kreisle and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01535066 (Randomized Blinded Sham- and Waitlist-Controlled Trial of Acupuncture for Joint Symptoms Related to Aromatase Inhibitors in Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 165 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
165citing papers in PubMed, 17 pooled it
21.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01535066 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Blinded Sham- and Waitlist-Controlled Trial of Acupuncture for Joint Symptoms Related to Aromatase Inhibitors in Women With Early Stage Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorSWOG Cancer Research NetworkRan2012 to 2018Enrolled226ConditionsBreast Cancer, PainArmsacupuncture therapy, sham acupuncture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

165 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 279 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

105 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Dawn L HershmanColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Joseph M UngerFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Heather GreenleeFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Jillian L CapodiceMount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.
Danika L LewFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Amy K DarkeFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Alice T KenglaKaiser Permanente Medical Center, Walnut Creek, California.
Marianne K MelnikSpectrum Health Medical Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
Carla W JorgensenNCORP of the Carolinas (Greenville Health System), Greenville, South Carolina.
William H KreisleSt Luke's Mountain States Tumor Institute (PCRC NCORP), Boise, Idaho.
Lori M MinasianDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Michael J FischAIM Specialty Health, Chicago, Illinois.
N Lynn HenryUniversity of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City.
Katherine D Crew
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USColumbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USKaiser Permanente Walnut Creek Medical Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · USNational Cancer Institute · USPrisma Health · USSpectrum Health · USSt. Luke's Mountain States Tumor Institute · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

SWOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D., MEYSKENS, FRANK L. · 1985 to 2014
$205.2M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
Acupuncture for Aromatase Inhibitor-Related Arthralgias in Breast Cancer PatientsR01AT006376 · NCCIH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HERSHMAN, DAWN · 2011 to 2015
$2.7M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT006376NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037429NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Musculoskeletal symptoms are the most common adverse effects of aromatase inhibitors and often result in therapy discontinuation. Small studies suggest that acupuncture may decrease aromatase inhibitor-related joint symptoms. Objective: To determine the effect of acupuncture in reducing aromatase inhibitor-related joint pain. Design, Setting, and Patients: Randomized clinical trial conducted at 11 academic centers and clinical sites in the United States from March 2012 to February 2017 (final date of follow-up, September 5, 2017). Eligible patients were postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer who were taking an aromatase inhibitor and scored at least 3 on the Brief Pain Inventory Worst Pain (BPI-WP) item (score range, 0-10; higher scores indicate greater pain). Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1:1 to the true acupuncture (n = 110), sham acupuncture (n = 59), or waitlist control (n = 57) group. True acupuncture and sham acupuncture protocols consisted of 12 acupuncture sessions over 6 weeks (2 sessions per week), followed by 1 session per week for 6 weeks. The waitlist control group did not receive any intervention. All participants were offered 10 acupuncture sessions to be used between weeks 24 and 52. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the 6-week BPI-WP score. Mean 6-week BPI-WP scores were compared by study group using linear regression, adjusted for baseline pain and stratification factors (clinically meaningful difference specified as 2 points). Results: Among 226 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [8.6] years; 88% white; mean [SD] baseline BPI-WP score, 6.6 [1.5]), 206 (91.1%) completed the trial. From baseline to 6 weeks, the mean observed BPI-WP score decreased by 2.05 points (reduced pain) in the true acupuncture group, by 1.07 points in the sham acupuncture group, and by 0.99 points in the waitlist control group. The adjusted difference for true acupuncture vs sham acupuncture was 0.92 points (95% CI, 0.20-1.65; P = .01) and for true acupuncture vs waitlist control was 0.96 points (95% CI, 0.24-1.67; P = .01). Patients in the true acupuncture group experienced more grade 1 bruising compared with patients in the sham acupuncture group (47% vs 25%; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: Among postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer and aromatase inhibitor-related arthralgias, true acupuncture compared with sham acupuncture or with waitlist control resulted in a statistically significant reduction in joint pain at 6 weeks, although the observed improvement was of uncertain clinical importance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01535066.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAromatase InhibitorsArthralgiaBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPostmenopauseSingle-Blind MethodWaiting ListsAromatase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID29998338
PMCPMC6583520
OpenAlexW2863163482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.