Observational studyJAMA surgery2018
Use of Video Review to Investigate Technical Factors That May Be Associated With Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Observational study in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Video Assessment of Surgical Performance in Robotic Gastroenterostomy During Pancreatoduodenectomy: Evaluating the Learning Curve and Risk of Delayed Gastric Emptying.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical significance and predictive factors of delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Balancing the scales: predictors of performance and the long-term impact of a robotic surgery curriculum.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and pancreatic surgery in the 21st century: triumphs, turning points, and unresolved challenges.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Delayed gastric emptying after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy: the Transatlantic Robot Pancreas Consortium (TROPANC).Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Video-based assessment identifies intraoperative predictors of clinically relevant POPF following minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Association of pylorus preservation with outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy across the United States.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- Feasibility and outcomes of robotic partial pancreatoduodenectomy.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Article
- The development of a deep learning model for automated segmentation of the robotic pancreaticojejunostomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Employing Advanced Technology to Reduce Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- Role of minimally invasive surgery in the management of localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Surgical Techniques of Gastrojejunostomy in Robotic Pancreatoduodenectomy: Robot-Sewn versus Stapled Gastrojejunostomy Anastomosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Risk factors for delayed gastric emptying in pancreaticoduodenectomy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Prognostic Significance of PNI in Patients With Pancreatic Head Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Risk-Stratified Pancreatectomy Clinical Pathway Implementation and Delayed Gastric Emptying.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021Article
- Article
- Surgical training model and safe implementation of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Japan: a technical note.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Early Nasojejunal Nutrition Versus Early Oral Feeding in Patients After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- SAGES Video-Based Assessment (VBA) program: a vision for life-long learning for surgeons.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Technical proficiency at robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and video assessment are promising tools for understanding postoperative outcomes. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) remains a major driver of cost and morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Objective: To determine if technical variables during RPD are associated with postoperative DGE. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective study was conducted of technical assessment performed in all available videos (n = 192) of consecutive RPDs performed at a single academic institution from October 3, 2008, through September 27, 2016. Exposures: Video review of gastrojejunal anastomosis during RPD. Main Outcomes and Measures: Delayed gastric emptying was classified according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. Video analysis reviewed technical variables specific in the construction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Using multivariate analysis, DGE was correlated with known patient variables and technical variables, individually and combined. Results: Of 410 RPDs performed, video was available for 192 RPDs (80 women and 112 men; mean [SD] age, 65.7 [11.1] years). Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 41 patients (21.4%; grade A, 15; grade B, 14; and grade C, 12). Patient variables contributing to DGE on multivariate analysis were advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.16; P < .001), small pancreatic duct size (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.98; P = .03), and postoperative pseudoaneurysm (OR, 17.29; 95% CI, 2.34-127.78; P = .005). However, technical variables contributing to decreased DGE on multivariate analysis included the flow angle (within 30° of vertical) between the stomach and efferent jejunal limb (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.79; P = .02), greater length of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20-0.77; P = .006), and a robotic-sewn anastomosis (robotic suture vs stapler: OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.95; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: This study examines modifiable technical factors through the use of review of video obtained at the time of operation and suggests ways by which the surgical construction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis during RPD may reduce the incidence of DGE as a framework for prospective quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.