ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018
Esophageal cancer in patients under 50: a SEER analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlates of the Stage of Esophageal Cancer at Diagnosis Among Patients: A Mixed-Methods Cross-Sectional Study.Cancer management and research · 2026Article
- Early-onset gastrointestinal cancers: comprehensive review and future directions.The British journal of surgery · 2025Review
- Construction of prognostic nomogram based on the SEER database for esophageal cancer patients.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
- Digestive cancer incidence and mortality among young adults worldwide in 2020: A population-based study.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022Article
- Construction and verification of prognostic nomogram for early-onset esophageal cancer.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021Article
- Landmark Cancer Clinical Trials and Real-World Patient Populations: Examining Race and Age Reporting.Cancers · 2021Article
- Effect of multidisciplinary team care on survival of oesophageal cancer patients: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Digestive tract neoplasms in young individuals: Demographics, staging and risk factors.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Is the age of diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma getting younger? Analysis at a tertiary care center.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2020Article
- Chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy for nonoperative early stage esophageal cancer: A seer data analysis.Cancer medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConcomitant with rising rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma, there has been a significant increase of diagnoses among relatively younger individuals. However, most studies that focus on esophageal cancer (EC) in younger patients have had small sample sizes of patients treated at a single institute. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, outcomes and independent prognostic factors for EC in patients under 50-year-old using a large, multi-center dataset.
methodsThe national Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was analyzed for EC reported from 2004 to 2013. Patients were divided into two groups, those under 50-year-old and those 50 years or older, and comparisons were made regarding demographics, histology, stage distribution, treatment, overall survival (OS), and esophageal cancer-specific survival (ECSS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were also used to identify independent prognostic factors.
resultsAmong the 16,544 eligible patients, 1,385 (8.37%) were under 50 and 15,159 (91.63%) were over 50. Compared with the older group, patients under 50 were characterized by a higher frequency of males, lower esophagus involvement, adenocarcinoma histology, stage III/IV disease, and receiving esophagectomy or radiation therapy. The stage-wise OS and ECSS were significantly better in the younger group (P<0.001). The multivariate analysis indicated that African-American heritage, grade III or IV, later stage, and not undergoing surgical or radiation therapy were independent negative prognostic factors of ECSS for patients under 50.
conclusionsEC patients under 50-year-old had distinctive clinicopathological characteristics compared with patients over 50-year-old. Despite more often presenting with stage III and IV disease, survival rates were better in the younger cohort. Prognostic factors for ECSS in patients under 50 differed from those in all age patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.