Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29997549›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2018

Social Facilitation of Laughter and Smiles in Preschool Children.

Caspar Addyman, Charlotte Fogelquist, Lenka Levakova, Sarah Rees

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Laughter, play faces and mimicry in animals: evolution and social functions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Robert Provine: the critical human importance of laughter, connections and contagion.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Tendency to laugh is a stable trait: findings from a round-robin conversation study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recognizing affiliation in colaughter and cospeech.Royal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caspar AddymanDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Charlotte FogelquistDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Lenka LevakovaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah ReesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Birkbeck, University of London · GBGoldsmiths University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surprisingly little is known about the social dimensions of laughter in preschool children. We studied children's responses to amusing video clips in the presence or absence of peers. The sample consisted of 9 boys and 11 girls aged 31-49 months (

Indexed as

humorlaughterpeer groupspreschoolerssmiles

Identifiers

PMID29997549
PMCPMC6030353
OpenAlexW2807635596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.