Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29997480›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2018

Effects of Voluntary Wheel-Running Types on Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Spatial Cognition in Middle-Aged Mice.

Yi-Qing Huang, Cheng Wu, Xiao-Fei He, Dan Wu, Xia He, Feng-Yin Liang, Guang-Yan Dai, Zhong Pei, Guang-Qing Xu, Yue Lan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Exercise for Brain Health: An Investigation into the Underlying Mechanisms Guided by Dose.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yi-Qing HuangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Cheng WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Fei HeDepartment of Neurology, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Dan WuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xia HeDepartment of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, Sichuan Bayi Rehabilitation Center, Chengdu, China.
Feng-Yin LiangDepartment of Neurology, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guang-Yan DaiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhong PeiDepartment of Neurology, National Key Clinical Department and Key Discipline of Neurology, Guangdong Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Major Neurological Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Guang-Qing XuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yue LanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNCapital Medical University · CNGuangzhou First People's Hospital · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While increasing evidence demonstrated that voluntary wheel running promotes cognitive function, little is known on how different types of voluntary wheel running affect cognitive function in elderly populations. We investigated the effects of various voluntary wheel-running types on adult hippocampal neurogenesis and spatial cognition in middle-aged mice. Male C57BL6 and Thy1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice (13 months) were equally assigned to one of the following groups: (1) T1: no voluntary wheel running; (2) T2: intermittent voluntary wheel running; and (3) T3: continuous voluntary wheel running. The Thy1-GFP transgenic mice were used to specifically label granule cells, since Thy-1 is a promoter for neuronal expression. Behavioral evaluations suggested that intermittent voluntary wheel running improved Morris water maze performance in middle-aged mice. The number of BrdU-positive cells was significantly higher in both intermittent and continuous voluntary wheel running compared with no voluntary wheel running. However, only intermittent voluntary wheel running facilitated the newborn cells to differentiate into granule cells, while newborn cells tended to differentiate into astrocytes and repopulation of microglia was also enhanced in the continuous voluntary wheel-running group. These results indicated that intermittent voluntary exercise may be more beneficial for enhancing spatial memory. Effective improvement of hippocampal neurogenesis was also caused by intermittent voluntary wheel running in middle-aged mice.

Indexed as

aginghippocampusneurogenesisspatial memorywheel running

Identifiers

PMID29997480
PMCPMC6028571
OpenAlexW2810075417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.