Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29997465›Full record

ArticleCurrent urology2018

Microbiological Analysis of Urine Cultures in Women after Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.

Melissa L Dawson, Meagan S Cramer, Dana R Thompson, Babak Vakili

Open access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa L DawsonFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of OB/GYN, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Meagan S CramerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
Dana R ThompsonCenter for Women's, Infants, and Children's Health Research, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
Babak VakiliCenter for Urogynecology and Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
Christiana Care Health System · USInstitute for Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsThe rate of urinary tract infection (UTI) after pelvic reconstructive surgery ranges from 9 to 48% and the most common uropathogen is

methodsA retrospective review was conducted on women who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery at a tertiary care center from July 2013 to June 2015. Data was collected from each postoperative visit to evaluate urinary tract symptoms, culture results and treatment in the 3-month postoperative interval.

resultsThere were 880 cases reviewed (mean age of 59.6 years) during the study period. The most common organism in positive cultures was

conclusionThe most common organism identified is

Indexed as

Foley catheterPelvic reconstructive surgeryUrinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID29997465
PMCPMC6036584
OpenAlexW2807238749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.