Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29997238›Full record

ReviewThe Plant cell2018

Karen-Beth G Scholthof, Sonia Irigoyen, Pilar Catalan, Kranthi K Mandadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant cell, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The First Observation of the Filamentous FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen-Beth G ScholthofDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 kbgs@tamu.edu pcatalan@unizar.es kkmandadi@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8169-9823
Sonia IrigoyenTexas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Weslaco, Texas 78596.ORCID 0000-0003-0647-4808
Pilar CatalanUniversidad de Zaragoza-Escuela Politécnica Superior de Huesca, 22071 Huesca, Spain kbgs@tamu.edu pcatalan@unizar.es kkmandadi@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7793-5259
Kranthi K MandadiDepartment of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843 kbgs@tamu.edu pcatalan@unizar.es kkmandadi@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2986-4016

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus

Indexed as

BrachypodiumChromosomes, PlantEcologyEvolution, MolecularGenome, PlantPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID29997238
PMCPMC6139682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.