Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29996947›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

The Post Clinic Ambulatory Blood Pressure (PC-ABP) study correlates Post Clinic Blood Pressure (PCBP) with the gold standard Ambulatory Blood Pressure.

Hunaina Shahab, Hamza Sohail Khan, Aysha Almas, Mayera Tufail, Khawar Abbas Kazmi, Aamir Hameed Khan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Office blood pressure measurement: A comprehensive review.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hunaina ShahabCardiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Second Floor, Faculty Offices Building, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Hamza Sohail KhanCardiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Second Floor, Faculty Offices Building, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Aysha AlmasInternal Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Second Floor, Faculty Offices Building, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Mayera TufailCardiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Second Floor, Faculty Offices Building, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Khawar Abbas KazmiCardiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Second Floor, Faculty Offices Building, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan.
Aamir Hameed KhanCardiology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Second Floor, Faculty Offices Building, Stadium Road, P.O. Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan. aamirhameedkhan@yahoo.com.
Aga Khan University Hospital · PK

Funding

Faculty of Health Sciences, Seed Money Commitee, Aga Khan University (PK) 80096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur previous study showed that post-clinic blood pressure (BP) taken 15 min after a physician-patient encounter was the lowest reading in a routine clinic. We aimed to validate this reading with 24 h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) readings. A cross-sectional study was conducted in the cardiology clinics at the Aga Khan University, Pakistan. Hypertensive patients aged ≥ 18 years, or those referred for the diagnosis of hypertension were included.

resultsOf 150 participants, 49% were males. 76% of all participants were hypertensive. Pre-clinic BP reading was measured by a nurse, in-clinic by a physician and 15 min post-clinic by a research assistant using a validated, automated BP device (Omron-HEM7221-E). All patients were referred for 24 h ABPM. Among the three readings taken during a clinic visit, mean (± SD) systolic BP (SBP) pre-clinic, in-clinic, and 15 min post-clinic were 153.2 ± 23, 152.3 ± 21, and 140.0 ± 18 mmHg, respectively. Mean (± SD) diastolic BP (DBP) taken pre-clinic, in-clinic and 15 min post-clinic were 83.5 ± 12, 90.9 ± 12, and 86.4 ± 11 mmHg respectively. Mean (± SD) daytime ambulatory SBP, DBP and pulse readings were 134.7 ± 15, 78.7 ± 15 mmHg, and 72.6 ± 12/min, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients of pre-clinic, in-clinic and post-clinic SBP with daytime ambulatory-SBP were 0.4 (p value: < 0.001), 0.5 (p value: < 0.001) and 0.6 (p value: < 0.001), respectively. Post-clinic BP has a good correlation with ambulatory BP and may be considered a more reliable reading in the clinic setting.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryAdolescentAdultBlood Pressure DeterminationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMalePakistanAmbulatory Blood Pressure MonitoringPost-clinic blood pressureWhite-coat effect

Identifiers

PMID29996947
PMCPMC6042456
OpenAlexW2812728925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.