Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29996936›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2018

Interprofessional team member's satisfaction: a mixed methods study of a Chilean hospital.

Pilar Espinoza, Marina Peduzzi, Heloise F Agreli, Melissa A Sutherland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Determinants of Job Satisfaction among Nurses from Chilean Hospitals.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Team climate and job satisfaction in a Mobile Emergency Care Service.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pilar EspinozaSchool of Nursing, Andes University of Chile, Moseñor Alvaro de Portillo 12455, Las Condes, Santiago, Chile. pespinoza2@miuandes.cl.
Marina PeduzziSchool of Nursing, Department of Professional Guidance, University of São Paulo, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar 419, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, 05403-000, Brazil.
Heloise F AgreliCatherine McAuley School of Nursing & Midwifery, University College Cork. Brookfield, College Rd,University College, Cork, T12 K8A, Ireland.
Melissa A SutherlandWilliam F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Ave, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe health organizations of today are highly complex and specialized. Given this scenario, there is a need for health professionals to work collaboratively within interprofessional work teams to ensure quality and safe care. To strengthen interprofessional teamwork, it is imperative that health organizations enhance strategic human resources management by promoting team member satisfaction.

objectiveTo analyze the satisfaction of members in interprofessional teams and to explore interpersonal relationships, leadership, and team climate in a hospital context. METHODOLOGY: This study is an explanatory sequential mixed methods (quantitative/qualitative) study of 53 teams (409 professionals) at a university hospital in Santiago, Chile. The first phase involved quantitative surveys with team members examining team satisfaction, transformational leadership, and team climate. Social network analysis was used to identify interactions among team members (cohesion and centrality). The second phase involved interviews with 15 professionals belonging to teams with the highest and lowest team satisfaction scores. Findings of both phases were integrated.

resultsSignificant associations were found among variables, and the linear regression model showed that team climate (β = 0.26) was a better predictor of team satisfaction than team leadership (β = 0.17). Registered nurse was perceived as the profession with the highest score on the transformational leadership measure (mean = 64), followed by the physician (mean = 33). Team networks with the highest and lowest score of team satisfaction showed differences in cohesion and centrality measures. Analysis of interviews identified five themes: attributes of interprofessional work; collaboration, communication, and social interaction; interprofessional team innovation; shared leadership; and interpersonal relationship interface work/social. Integration of findings revealed that team member satisfaction requires participation and communication, common goals and commitment for patient-centered care, clear roles and objectives to support collaborative work, and the presence of a transformational leader to strengthen well-being, dialog, and innovation.

conclusionsResults have the potential to contribute to the planning and decision-making in the field of human resources, providing elements to promote the management of health teams and support team member satisfaction. In turn, this could lead to job permanence especially where the local health needs are more urgent.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationCooperative BehaviorInterprofessional RelationsJob SatisfactionPatient Care TeamPersonnel, HospitalAdultChileFemaleHospitalsHumansLeadershipMalePersonal SatisfactionQualitative ResearchHealthcare teamsInterdisciplinary teamsMixed methodsSatisfaction with the teamTeam climateTeam workTransformational leadership

Identifiers

PMID29996936
PMCPMC6042408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.