Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29996925›Full record

ArticleArthritis research & therapy2018

Radiographs in screening for sacroiliitis in children: what is the value?

Pamela F Weiss, Rui Xiao, Timothy G Brandon, David M Biko, Walter P Maksymowych, Robert G Lambert, Jacob L Jaremko, Nancy A Chauvin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Defining axial involvement in juvenile SpA.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recent Updates in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  9. Advances in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis.Current rheumatology reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Enthesitis-related arthritis: current perspectives.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pamela F WeissDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Rheumatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA. weisspa@email.chop.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9724-0443
Rui XiaoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Timothy G BrandonDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Rheumatology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David M BikoDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Walter P MaksymowychDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Robert G LambertDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Jacob L JaremkoDepartment of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Nancy A ChauvinDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Rheumatology Research Foundation Innovative Research award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of pelvic radiographs versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints in children with suspected sacroiliitis.

methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study of children with suspected or confirmed spondyloarthritis who underwent pelvic radiograph and MRI within 6 months of one another. Images were scored independently by five raters. Interrater reliability was calculated using Fleiss's kappa coefficient (κ). Test properties of radiographs for depiction of sacroiliitis were calculated using MRI global sacroiliitis impression as the reference standard.

resultsThe interrater agreement for global impression was κ = 0.34 (95% CI 0.19-0.52) for radiographs and κ = 0.72 (95% CI 0.52-0.86) for MRI. Across raters, the sensitivity of radiographs ranged from 25 to 77.8% and specificity ranged from 60.8 to 92.2%. Positive and negative predictive values ranged from 25.9 to 52% and from 82.7 to 93.9%, respectively. The misclassification rate ranged from 6 to 17% for negative radiographs/positive MRI scans and from 48 to 74% for positive radiographs/negative MRI scans. When the reference standard was changed to structural lesions consistent with sacroiliitis on MRI, the misclassification rate was higher for negative radiographs/positive MRI scans (9-23%) and marginally improved for positive radiographs/negative MRI scans (33-52%).

conclusionInterrater reliability of MRI was superior to radiographs for global sacroiliitis impression. Misclassification for both negative and positive radiographs was high across raters. Radiographs have limited utility in screening for sacroiliitis in children and result in a significant proportion of both false negative and positive findings versus MRI findings.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleObserver VariationRadiographyRetrospective StudiesSacroiliitisJuvenile spondyloarthritisMagnetic resonance imagingMisclassificationRadiographSacroiliitis

Identifiers

PMID29996925
PMCPMC6042355
OpenAlexW2823823069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.