ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2018
Knowledge database assisted gene marker selection for chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Significance of PPARA as a Treatment Target for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.PPAR research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether previously curated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) risk genes could be leveraged in gene marker selection for the diagnosis and prediction of CLL. Methods A CLL genetic database (CLL_042017) was developed through a comprehensive CLL-gene relation data analysis, in which 753 CLL target genes were curated. Expression values for these genes were used for case-control classification of four CLL datasets, with a sparse representation-based variable selection (SRVS) approach employed for feature (gene) selection. Results were compared with outcomes obtained by using analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based gene selection approaches. Results For each of the four datasets, SRVS selected a subset of genes from the 753 CLL target genes, resulting in significantly higher classification accuracy, compared with randomly selected genes (100%, 100%, 93.94%, 89.39%). The SRVS method outperformed ANOVA in terms of classification accuracy. Conclusion Gene markers selected from the 753 CLL genes could enable significantly greater accuracy in the prediction of CLL. SRVS provides an effective method for gene marker selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.