ArticlePloS one2018
Disparities by race, age, and sex in the improvement of survival for lymphoma: Findings from a population-based study.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of sociodemographic determinants on enrollment into contemporary lymphoma clinical trials: a systematic review.The oncologist · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Etiology of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A review from epidemiologic studies.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2022Review
- Racial Disparities in Survival Among Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients: An Analysis of the SEER Database (2007-2015).Cureus · 2022Article
- Sampling-based estimation for massive survival data with additive hazards model.Statistics in medicine · 2021Article
- Predictive Model for Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of oncology · 2021Article
- Cancer statistics for adults aged 85 years and older, 2019.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2019Article
- Racial/ethnic, age and sex disparities in leukemia survival among adults in the United States during 1973-2014 period.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate improvement in survival of lymphoma patients from 1990 to 2014, stratified by age, sex and race using Surveillance Epidemiology and End-Result Survey Program (SEER) data. STUDY DESIGN AND
settingWe identified 113,788 incident lymphoma cases from nine SEER cancer registries were followed up for cause-specific mortality from lymphoma. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and their respective 95% confidence interval (CIs) for various time periods within groups stratified by race, age and sex.
resultsFive-year survival for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) was 89% for patients 20-49 years of age. For this age group, compared to 1990-1994, survival significantly improved in 2000-2004 (HR = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.54-0.78), 2005-2009 (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.38-0.57) and 2010-2014 (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.20-0.41). Hodgkin's lymphoma patients aged 75-85 years had 5-year survival of 37% and in these patients, compared to 1990-1994, survival only improved from 2005 onward (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.50-0.90). In patients with non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), all age groups showed survival improvements between 1990-1994 period and 2010-2014 period. Improvements in HL and NHL survival were seen for all race categories and both genders.
conclusionSurvival among US lymphoma patients has improved substantially between 1990-1994 period and 2010-2014 period, though disease-specific mortality was still higher in older age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.