Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29995783›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Long-term outcomes and prognostic markers in gallbladder cancer.

Xiwei Cui, Sha Zhu, Zhihang Tao, Xinghao Deng, Yexiao Wang, Yuanjing Gao, Yue Liao, Weijun Ma, Yiwen Zhang, Xuelei Ma

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Epidemiology of Gallbladder Cancer in Saudi Arabia.Cancer management and research · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiwei CuiCancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University Department of Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sha Zhu
Zhihang Tao
Xinghao Deng
Yexiao Wang
Yuanjing Gao
Yue Liao
Weijun Ma
Yiwen Zhang
Xuelei Ma

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-related inflammation and systemic inflammatory markers have been widely recognized as an essential part in tumor multiplication, invasion, and metastasis of tumor cells. This study aimed to estimate and compare the prognostic value of various biomarkers on overall survival (OS) in patients with gallbladder cancer patients.We performed a retrospective study of 159 patients received different therapies in West China Hospital from 2009 to 2014. The preoperative biomarker data, including neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), lactate dehydrogenase, and alkaline phosphatase, as well as other clinical information, were obtained from electronic record. And the receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the optimal cut-off values of them. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model analysis were applied to evaluate the association between markers and OS.The optimal cut-off value was 4.39 for NLR, 181.85 for PLR, 0.30 for MLR, and 3.02 for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate Cox analysis both demonstrated the significant prognostic value of NLR, MLR, and CEA. However, PLR failed to be a significant predictor of OS. The multivariate Cox analysis showed that preoperative NLR and CEA were independent prognostic factors for OS.Advanced tumor/node/metastasis stage, enhanced pretherapeutic NLR, and CEA were significantly associated with worse OS of gallbladder cancer patients. Furthermore, NLR was a better prognostic factor than CEA in advanced T (T3-T4) stage patients, while CEA was better for early T (T1-T2) stage, early N (N0-N1) stage, and early M (M0) stage patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBlood Cell CountCarcinoembryonic AntigenFemaleGallbladder NeoplasmsHumansInflammationKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoembryonic Antigen

Identifiers

PMID29995783
PMCPMC6076111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.