Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29995751›Full record

ArticleMedicine2018

The procalcitonin/albumin ratio as an early diagnostic predictor in discriminating urosepsis from patients with febrile urinary tract infection.

Xin Luo, Xiang Yang, Jiexian Li, Ge Zou, Yufeng Lin, Guoqiang Qing, Ruilin Yang, Weixiang Yao, Xuying Ye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PCT-to-albumin ratio and CRP-to-albumin ratio as predictors of febrile neutropenia complications: a prospective observational trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Guidelines for the Use of Procalcitonin for Rational Use of Antibiotics.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Urosepsis-A Literature Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xin LuoDepartment of Urology Department of Gynecology, Panyu Central Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang Yang
Jiexian Li
Ge Zou
Yufeng Lin
Guoqiang Qing
Ruilin Yang
Weixiang Yao
Xuying Ye
Panyu District Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrimination between urosepsis and febrile urinary tract infections is important in therapeutic decision-making to indicate suitable treatments to avoid sepsis-related organ failure. Accurate diagnosis is time-consuming and susceptible to false-positive results. Moreover, patient responses to urosepsis are complex and varied. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a new, early diagnostic predictor that could discriminate between patients with urosepsis and those with febrile urinary tract infections using a combination of initial procalcitonin and albumin levels.We conducted a retrospective study involving 140 patients with febrile urinary tract infections from January 2013 to December 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for differentiating urosepsis from febrile urinary tract infection. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to compare the predictive accuracy of the procalcitonin/albumin ratio.Patients in the urosepsis group had higher procalcitonin/albumin ratios compared to those in the febrile urinary tract infection group [2.254 (0.978, 6.299) vs 0.021 (0.004, 0.095); P < .001]. Based on multivariate logistic analysis, the procalcitonin/albumin ratio [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.029, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.013-1.045, P < .001] was an independent predictor of urosepsis, which allowed for differentiation from patients with febrile urinary tract infections. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the procalcitonin/albumin ratio was 0.937 (95% CI, 0.894-0.980); P < .001. The sensitivity and specificity of the procalcitonin/albumin ratio cut-off values (>0.44) were 84.62% and 96.00%, respectively. Moreover, in the subset of 65 patients with urosepsis, the procalcitonin/albumin ratio in the uroseptic shock group was higher than in the group of patients without uroseptic shock [5.46 (1.43, 6.58) vs 1.24 (0.63, 4.38); P = .009].Our study demonstrates that the procalcitonin/albumin ratio is an early diagnostic predictor that can discriminate between urosepsis and febrile urinary tract infection. Additionally, in patients with urosepsis, those with higher procalcitonin/albumin ratios were more prone to uroseptic shock. Our findings suggest that the procalcitonin/albumin ratio is a rapid and relatively low-cost biomarker that can be used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Shock, SepticUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedBiomarkersCalcitoninChinaDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly DiagnosisFemaleFeverHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersCalcitoninSerum Albumin

Identifiers

PMID29995751
PMCPMC6076169
OpenAlexW2815203924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.