Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29995274›Full record

Trial reportCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2018

Enhancing theory of mind in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia with transcranial direct current stimulation.

Maria Cotelli, Mauro Adenzato, Valentina Cantoni, Rosa Manenti, Antonella Alberici, Ivan Enrici, Alberto Benussi, Valentina Dell'Era, Elisa Bonetta, Alessandro Padovani and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria CotelliNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio-Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Mauro AdenzatoDepartment of Psychology, University of Turin, via Po 14, 10123, Turin, Italy. mauro.adenzato@unito.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6997-9283
Valentina CantoniDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Rosa ManentiNeuropsychology Unit, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio-Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
Antonella AlbericiDepartment of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Ivan EnriciNeuroscience Institute of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alberto BenussiCentre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Valentina Dell'EraCentre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Elisa BonettaCentre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandro PadovaniCentre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Barbara BorroniCentre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
University of Brescia · ITCentro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli · ITNeuroscience Institute · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is a form of frontotemporal degeneration characterized by early changes in personality, emotional blunting, and/or loss of empathy. Recent research has highlighted that these features may be at least partially explained by impairments in the theory of mind (ToM; i.e., the ability to understand and predict other people's behaviour by attributing independent mental states to them). The aim of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to test the hypothesis that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the medial frontal cortex (MFC) selectively enhances communicative intention processing, a specific ToM ability. Using a single-session online design, we administered a ToM task that measures the ability to represent other people's private and communicative intentions during active or sham tDCS to 16 bvFTD patients. To assess the impact of dementia on performance on the ToM task, we included 16 age-matched healthy volunteers who were asked to perform the entire experimental ToM task. BvFTD is characterized by an impairment in the comprehension of both communicative and private intentions relative to a healthy control group and by a disproportional impairment in communicative intention compared with private intention processing. Significant and selective accuracy improvement in the comprehension of communicative intentions after active stimulation was observed in patients with bvFTD. This is the first study that analyses ToM ability in patients with bvFTD using tDCS stimulation. Our findings could potentially contribute to the development of an effective, noninvasive brain stimulation treatment of ToM impairments in patients with bvFTD.

Indexed as

Social PerceptionAgedCognitionComprehensionDouble-Blind MethodEmpathyFemaleFrontal LobeFrontotemporal DementiaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeTheory of MindTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAnodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD)Medial frontal cortex (MFC)Theory of mind (ToM)

Identifiers

PMID29995274
OpenAlexW2828497389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.