ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2018
Effect of Site-Specific Intermolecular Lysine-Tryptophan Interactions on the Aggregation of Gramicidin-Based Peptides Leading to Pore Formation in Lipid Membranes.
Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In contrast to the parent pentadecapeptide gramicidin A (gA), some of its cationic analogs have been shown previously to form large-diameter pores in lipid membranes. These pores are permeable to fluorescent dyes, which allows one to monitor pore formation by using the fluorescence de-quenching assay. According to the previously proposed model, the gA analog with lysine substituted for alanine at position 3, [Lys3]gA, forms pores by a homopentameric assembly of gramicidin double-stranded β-helical dimers. Here, we studied the newly synthesized analogs of [Lys3]gA with single, double and triple substitutions of isoleucines for tryptophans at positions 9, 11, 13, and 15. Replacement of any of the tryptophans of [Lys3]gA with isoleucine resulted in suppression of the pore-forming activity of the peptide, the effect being significantly dependent on the position of tryptophans. In particular, the peptide with a single substitution of tryptophan 13 showed much lower activity than the analogs with single substitutions at positions 9, 11, or 15. Of the peptides with double substitutions, the strongest suppression of the leakage was observed with tryptophans 13 and 15. In the case of triple substitutions, only the peptide retaining tryptophan 11 exhibited noticeable activity. It is concluded that tryptophans 11 and 13 contribute most to pore stabilization in the membrane, whereas tryptophan 9 is not so important for pore formation. Cation-π interactions between the lysine and tryptophan residues of the peptide are suggested to be crucial for the formation of the [Lys3]gA pore.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.