Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29995217›Full record

Trial reportCancer causes & control : CCC2018

A randomized trial of mailed HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women in South Florida.

Erin Kobetz, Julia Seay, Tulay Koru-Sengul, Jordan Baeker Bispo, Dinah Trevil, Martha Gonzalez, Andrew Brickman, Olveen Carrasquillo

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. A Mail-Based HPV Self-Collection Program to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia: Results of a Group Randomized Trial.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erin KobetzDepartment of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami-Dade, FL, USA. EKobetz@med.miami.edu.
Julia SeayDepartment of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami-Dade, FL, USA.
Tulay Koru-SengulSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami-Dade, FL, USA.
Jordan Baeker BispoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami-Dade, FL, USA.
Dinah TrevilSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami-Dade, FL, USA.
Martha GonzalezSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami-Dade, FL, USA.
Andrew BrickmanThe Health Choice Network, Miami-Dade, FL, USA.
Olveen CarrasquilloDepartment of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami-Dade, FL, USA.

Funding

Tumor Biology Research ProgramP30CA240139 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI George S. Grills · 2019 to 2026
$24.1M
Increasing Uptake of Evidence Based Screening Services though a CHW-led multi-modality program: The South Florida Center for Reducing Health DisparitiesU01MD010614 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, KOBETZ, ERIN N · 2016 to 2019
$2.4M
Addressing Cervical Cancer Disparity in South Florida CBPR in ActionR01CA183612 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KOBETZ, ERIN N · 2014 to 2017
$2.0M
Increasing Uptake of Evidence Based Screening Services though a CHW-led multi-modality program: The South Florida Center for Reducing Health DisparitiesR01MD010614 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARRASQUILLO, OLVEEN, KOBETZ, ERIN N · 2020 to 2020
$480k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA183612NCI NIH HHS P30 CA240139NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183612NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD010614NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD010614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHPV self-sampling has previously been shown to increase cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority and immigrant women. We conducted a randomized pragmatic trial to examine the effectiveness of HPV self-sampling delivered via in-person versus by US mail for medically underserved Hispanic, Haitian, and non-Hispanic Black women living in South Florida.

methodsWe randomized women aged 30-65 who had not completed Pap smear screening in the past 3 years into two groups: (1) HPV self-sampling delivered in-person (IP) by a community health worker (CHW; IP + SS) or (2) HPV self-sampling delivered via US mail (SS + Mail). Our primary outcome was HPV self-sampling completion by 6-month post-study enrollment.

resultsWe enrolled 600 women. Approximately 65% were Hispanic and 35% were Haitian or non-Hispanic Black. Nearly half (43%) had an income of less than $20,000/year and 67% were uninsured. In intent-to-treat analyses, 71.6% of participants in the SS + Mail group and 81.0% of participants in the IP + SS group completed HPV self-sampling.

conclusionMailed HPV self-sampling is an effective strategy to increase cervical cancer screening among underserved immigrant and ethnic minority women.

Indexed as

Specimen HandlingAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanEarly Detection of CancerEmigrants and ImmigrantsEthnicityFemaleFloridaHaitiHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedMinority GroupsPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsCervical cancer screeningHPVImmigrantSelf-samplingWomen

Identifiers

PMID29995217
PMCPMC6329676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.