Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29995001›Full record

SynthesisOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2018

Hearing Changes After Intratympanic Steroids for Secondary (Salvage) Therapy of Sudden Hearing Loss: A Meta-Analysis Using Mathematical Simulations of Drug Delivery Protocols.

Arne Liebau, Olivia Pogorzelski, Alec N Salt, Stefan K Plontke

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intratympanic corticosteroids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Intratympanic application of triamcinolone in sudden hearing loss-radiologic anatomy in cone beam CT and its' correlation to clinical outcome.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Article
  10. Steroid Nomenclature in Inner Ear Therapy.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Arne LiebauDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Olivia PogorzelskiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Alec N SaltDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Stefan K PlontkeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

INNER EAR FLUID INTERACTIONSR01DC001368 · NIDCD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SALT, ALEC N · 1992 to 2019
$6.9M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001368
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe use of glucocorticoids for secondary (salvage/rescue) therapy of idiopathic sudden hearing loss (ISSHL), including controlled and uncontrolled studies with intratympanic injections or continuous, catheter mediated applications, were evaluated by means of a meta-analysis in an attempt to define optimal local drug delivery protocols for ISSHL. STUDY

designA total of 30 studies with 33 treatment groups between January 2000 and June 2014 were selected based on sufficiently detailed description of application protocols. Cochlear drug levels were calculated by a validated computer model of drug dispersion in the inner ear fluids based on the concentration and volume of glucocorticoids applied, the time drug remained in the middle ear, and on the specific timing of injections. Various factors were compared with hearing outcome, including baseline data, individual parameters of the application protocols, calculated peak concentration (Cmax), and total dose (area under the curve, AUC).

resultsThere was no dependence of hearing outcome on individual parameters of the application protocol, Cmax or AUC. Hearing gain and final hearing thresholds were independent of treatment delay.

conclusionBased on the available data from uncontrolled and controlled randomized and non-randomized studies no clear recommendation can be made so far for a specific application protocol for either primary or secondary (salvage) intratympanic steroid treatment in patients with ISSHL. For meta-analyses, change in pure tone average (PTA) may not be an adequate outcome parameter to assess effectiveness of the intervention especially with inhomogeneity of patient populations. Final PTA might provide a better outcome parameter.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDexamethasoneFemaleGlucocorticoidsHearingHearing Loss, SensorineuralHearing Loss, SuddenHumansInjection, IntratympanicMaleMethylprednisoloneMiddle AgedSalvage TherapyTreatment OutcomeDexamethasoneGlucocorticoidsMethylprednisolone

Identifiers

PMID29995001
PMCPMC6481671
OpenAlexW2814514807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.