Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29994993›Full record

ArticlePain2018

Electrophysiological characterisation of central sensitisation in canine spontaneous osteoarthritis.

James R Hunt, Megan Goff, Helen Jenkins, John Harris, Toby G Knowles, B Duncan X Lascelles, Masataka Enomoto, Michael Mendl, Helen R Whay, Joanna C Murrell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Quantitative sensory testing in dogs with spontaneous osteoarthritis.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Pressure pain mapping of equine distal joints: feasibility and reliability.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The beneficial role of companion animals in translational pain research.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James R HuntBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Megan GoffBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Helen JenkinsBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
John HarrisArthritis Research UK Pain Centre, and Division of Animal Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Toby G KnowlesBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
B Duncan X LascellesComparative Pain Research and Education Centre, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Masataka EnomotoComparative Pain Research and Education Centre, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States.
Michael MendlBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Helen R WhayBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Joanna C MurrellBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GBNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L00240X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In man, central sensitisation (CS) contributes to the pain of osteoarthritis (OA). Dogs with spontaneous OA may also exhibit CS. Electrophysiological reflex measurements are more objective than behavioural assessments and can be used to evaluate CS in preclinical and clinical studies. It was hypothesised that dogs suffering from OA would exhibit electrophysiological characteristics indicative of CS, associated with reduced diffuse noxious inhibitory controls (DNICs). One hundred and seventeen client-owned dogs were recruited to the study. Hind limb nociceptive withdrawal reflex thresholds, stimulus response, and temporal summation characteristics were recorded, during alfaxalone anaesthesia, from 46 OA dogs, 29 OA dogs receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (OANSAIDs), and 27 breed- and weight-matched control dogs. Efficacy of DNIC was evaluated in 12 control and 11 of the OA dogs, by application of a mechanical conditioning stimulus to the contralateral forelimb. Nociceptive withdrawal reflex thresholds were higher in OA compared with control dogs (P = 0.02). Stimulus response characteristics demonstrated an augmented response in OANSAID dogs compared with OA (P < 0.001) and control (P < 0.001) dogs. Temporal summation demonstrated exaggerated C-fibre-mediated responses in both OA (P < 0.001) and OANSAID (P = 0.005) groups, compared with control animals. Conditioning stimulus application resulted in inhibition of test reflex responses in both OA and control animals (P < 0.001); control animals demonstrated greater inhibition compared with OA (P = 0.0499). These data provide evidence of neurophysiological changes consistent with CS in dogs with spontaneous OA and demonstrate that canine OA is associated with reduced DNIC.

Indexed as

AcepromazineAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCase-Control StudiesCentral Nervous System SensitizationDogsDopamine AntagonistsElectromyographyElectrophysiological PhenomenaEvoked Potentials, MotorMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesOsteoarthritisPain ThresholdReflexX-RaysAcepromazineAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDopamine Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID29994993
PMCPMC6195806
OpenAlexW2883783131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.