ArticleJournal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999)2018
A Global Research Agenda for Pediatric HIV.
Article in Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Sustained Viral Suppression among Children Living with HIV in Kenya: Secondary Analysis of Data from a Randomized Control Study.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Research priorities for advanced HIV disease in Latin America and the Caribbean region: a modified Delphi study.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Global burden of viral infectious diseases of poverty based on Global Burden of Diseases Study 2021.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2024Article
- Early Effects of Scaling Up Dolutegravir-Based ARV Regimens Among Children Living with HIV in Malawi.AIDS and behavior · 2024Article
- Assessing user preferences for design characteristics of oral dissolvable strips for pediatric HIV medication: a qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- A phenomenological study of the beliefs of family caregivers of children living with HIV/AIDS on adherence to antiretroviral therapy.Nursing open · 2023Article
- "I am not alone with tears": embodying stigma and longing among youth living with perinatally acquired HIV in Tanzania through a collaborative arts-based approach.Medical humanities · 2023Article
- Roadmap for Achieving Universal Antiretroviral Treatment.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2023Review
- Taking lead from the community: What do young people living with HIV want us to research?PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Influence of Healthy Habits Counseling on Biochemical and Metabolic Parameters in Children and Adolescents with HIV: Longitudinal Study.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Clinical Characteristics of Children with HIV Initiated on Antiretroviral Treatment at HIV Clinics in Bloemfontein, South Africa.International journal of MCH and AIDS · 2021Article
- Strengthening Existing Laboratory-Based Systems vs. Investing in Point-of-Care Assays for Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV: A Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2020Article
- Clinical and operational factors associated with low pediatric inpatient HIV testing coverage in Mozambique.Public health action · 2019Article
- Toward Improving Accessibility of Point-of-Care Diagnostic Services for Maternal and Child Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Point of care · 2019Article
- Article
- Making Implementation Science Work for Children and Adolescents Living With HIV.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018Article
- Ensuring Children and Adolescents Are Not Left Behind.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018Article
- Setting Global Research Priorities in Pediatric and Adolescent HIV Using the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative (CHNRI) Methodology.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite progress, 2016 still saw 160,000 new infections and 120,000 AIDS-related deaths among children. Evidence gaps on how to best diagnose, treat, and deliver services to children living with HIV remain. A global research prioritization exercise was undertaken by WHO and CIPHER to focus research efforts in the context of diminishing resources.
methodsThe Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative methodology was adapted and used, as described by Irvine et al. Outcomes were reviewed by an expert group and 5 priority themes identified for testing, antiretroviral treatment, and service delivery, accounting for existing policies, published literature and ongoing research.
resultsA total of 749 questions were submitted by 269 individuals from 62 countries. For HIV testing, priority themes included strategies and interventions to improve access, uptake and linkage to care, including with novel diagnostic tools and entry points beyond antenatal care. For treatment, priorities included strategies to improve adherence, short- and long-term outcomes and management of coinfections, optimal drug formulations, and early ART. For service delivery, priorities included strategies or interventions to improve access, uptake and retention in care, including psychosocial and family support and approaches to HIV disclosure and reduction of stigma and discrimination.
conclusionsThis is the largest Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative exercise undertaken in HIV. The results provide guidance to focus future research in pediatric HIV for impact. Global commitment to support priority research, adequate investment, and strong leadership is urgently needed to improve the health and well-being of children living with and affected by HIV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.