Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29994844›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2018

Increasing Nerve Autograft Length Increases Senescence and Reduces Regeneration.

Gwendolyn M Hoben, Xueping Ee, Lauren Schellhardt, Ying Yan, Daniel A Hunter, Amy M Moore, Alison K Snyder-Warwick, Sheila Stewart, Susan E Mackinnon, Matthew D Wood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Management of "Long" Nerve Gaps.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gwendolyn M HobenFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Xueping EeFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Lauren SchellhardtFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Ying YanFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Daniel A HunterFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Amy M MooreFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Alison K Snyder-WarwickFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Sheila StewartFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Susan E MackinnonFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
Matthew D WoodFrom the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; and the Division of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University.
University of Washington · US

Funding

THE ROLE OF SCHWANN CELL SENESCENCE IN PERIPHERAL NERVE REGENERATIONR01NS086773 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MACKINNON, SUSAN E · 2015 to 2019
$2.1M
Investigation of Terminal Schwann Cell Function in Homeostasis and InjuryK08NS096232 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER-WARWICK, ALISON K · 2017 to 2020
$717k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS096232NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS086773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNerve grafting with an autograft is considered the gold standard. However, the functional outcomes of long (>3 cm) nerve autografting are often poor. The authors hypothesized that a factor contributing to these outcomes is the graft microenvironment, where long compared to short autografts support axon regeneration to different extents.

methodsA rat sciatic nerve defect model was used to compare regeneration in short (2 cm) and long (6 cm) isografts. Axon regeneration and cell populations within grafts were assessed using histology, retrograde labeling of neurons regenerating axons, immunohistochemistry, quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and electron microscopy at 4 and/or 8 weeks.

resultsAt 8 weeks, for distances of both 1 and 2 cm from the proximal coaptation (equivalent regenerative distance), long isografts had reduced numbers of regenerated fibers compared with short isografts. Similarly, the number of motoneurons regenerating axons was reduced in the presence of long isografts compared with short isografts. Considering the regenerative microenvironments between short and long isografts, cell densities and general populations within both short and long isografts were similar. However, long isografts had significantly greater expression of senescence markers, which included senescence-associated β-galactosidase, p21, and p16, and distinct chromatin changes within Schwann cells.

conclusionsThis study shows that axon regeneration is reduced in long compared with short isografts, where long isografts contained an environment with an increased accumulation of senescent markers. Although autografts are considered the gold standard for grafting, these results demonstrate that we must continue to strive for improvements in the autograft regenerative environment.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutograftsCellular SenescenceMaleNerve RegenerationRandom AllocationRats, Inbred LewSciatic NerveTransplantation, Autologous

Identifiers

PMID29994844
PMCPMC6156921
OpenAlexW2813758004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.