ArticleIEEE transactions on cybernetics2019
3-D Fully Convolutional Networks for Multimodal Isointense Infant Brain Image Segmentation.
Article in IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- BIBSNet: A deep learning baby image brain segmentation network for MRI scans.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Multi-modal and Multi-view Cervical Spondylosis Imaging Dataset.Scientific data · 2025Article
- A foundation model for enhancing magnetic resonance images and downstream segmentation, registration and diagnostic tasks.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Ensemble-based multiclass lung cancer classification using hybrid CNN-SVD feature extraction and selection method.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Novel Mis-Seg-Focus Loss Function Based on a Two-Stage nnU-Net Framework for Accurate Brain Tissue Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep learning for MRI lesion segmentation in rectal cancer.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- Automatic segmentation of inconstant fractured fragments for tibia/fibula from CT images using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Fully automated imaging protocol independent system for pituitary adenoma segmentation: a convolutional neural network-based model on sparsely annotated MRI.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- 3D-MASNet: 3D mixed-scale asymmetric convolutional segmentation network for 6-month-old infant brain MR images.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Deep Learning for Detecting Brain Metastases on MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2023Review
- MLRD-Net: 3D multiscale local cross-channel residual denoising network for MRI-based brain tumor segmentation.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- PAM-DenseNet: A Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Computer-Aided COVID-19 Diagnosis.IEEE transactions on cybernetics · 2022Article
- Attention 3D U-Net with Multiple Skip Connections for Segmentation of Brain Tumor Images.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Semantic Segmentation of Extraocular Muscles on Computed Tomography Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Aging of Chinese bony orbit: automatic calculation based on UNet++ and connected component analysis.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2022Article
- A fully automatic AI system for tooth and alveolar bone segmentation from cone-beam CT images.Nature communications · 2022Article
- A cascaded nested network for 3T brain MR image segmentation guided by 7T labeling.Pattern recognition · 2022Article
- RDAU-Net: Based on a Residual Convolutional Neural Network With DFP and CBAM for Brain Tumor Segmentation.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- DORIS: A diffusion MRI-based 10 tissue class deep learning segmentation algorithm tailored to improve anatomically-constrained tractography.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate segmentation of infant brain images into different regions of interest is one of the most important fundamental steps in studying early brain development. In the isointense phase (approximately 6-8 months of age), white matter and gray matter exhibit similar levels of intensities in magnetic resonance (MR) images, due to the ongoing myelination and maturation. This results in extremely low tissue contrast and thus makes tissue segmentation very challenging. Existing methods for tissue segmentation in this isointense phase usually employ patch-based sparse labeling on single modality. To address the challenge, we propose a novel 3-D multimodal fully convolutional network (FCN) architecture for segmentation of isointense phase brain MR images. Specifically, we extend the conventional FCN architectures from 2-D to 3-D, and, rather than directly using FCN, we intuitively integrate coarse (naturally high-resolution) and dense (highly semantic) feature maps to better model tiny tissue regions, in addition, we further propose a transformation module to better connect the aggregating layers; we also propose a fusion module to better serve the fusion of feature maps. We compare the performance of our approach with several baseline and state-of-the-art methods on two sets of isointense phase brain images. The comparison results show that our proposed 3-D multimodal FCN model outperforms all previous methods by a large margin in terms of segmentation accuracy. In addition, the proposed framework also achieves faster segmentation results compared to all other methods. Our experiments further demonstrate that: 1) carefully integrating coarse and dense feature maps can considerably improve the segmentation performance; 2) batch normalization can speed up the convergence of the networks, especially when hierarchical feature aggregations occur; and 3) integrating multimodal information can further boost the segmentation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.