ArticleIEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society2018
Reshaping Movement Distributions With Limit-Push Robotic Training.
Article in IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of robot viscous forces on arm movements in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized crossover study.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2020Trial
- Evaluation of a passive wearable arm ExoNET.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-cost situations need to be avoided. However, occasionally, cost may only be learned by experience. Here, we tested whether an artificially induced unstable and invisible high-cost region, a "limit-push" force field, might reshape people's motion distributions. Healthy and neurologically impaired (chronic stroke) populations attempted 600 interceptions of a projectile while holding a robot handle that could render forces to the hand. The "limit-push," in the middle of the study, pushed the hand outward unless the hand stayed within a box-shaped region. Both healthy and some stroke survivors adapted through selection of safer actions, avoiding the high-cost regions (outside the box); they stayed more inside and even kept a greater distance from the box's boundaries. This was supported by other measures that showed subjects distributed their hand movements within the box more uniformly. These effects lasted a very short time after returning to the no-force condition. Although most robotic teaching approaches focus on shifting the mean, this limit-push treatment demonstrates how both mean and variance might be reshaped in motor training and neurorehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.