ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2018
A Dedicated 36-Channel Receive Array for Fetal MRI at 3T.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving Image Quality and Decreasing SAR With High Dielectric Constant Pads in 3 T Fetal MRI.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
- Design and evaluation of multimodal concentric surface coils for 3T MR imaging.Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine ... Scientific Meeting and Exhibition. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition · 2025Article
- Adaptable, wearable, and stretchable coils: A review.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Review
- A multimodal axial array resonator and its application in radiofrequency (RF) volume coil designs for low-field open magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Development of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) phantom.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Coupled stack-up volume RF coils for low-field open MR imaging.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Electric field and SAR reduction in high-impedance RF arrays by using high permittivity materials for 7T MR imaging.PloS one · 2024Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the monkey fetal brain in utero.Investigative magnetic resonance imaging · 2022Article
- Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla - the European experience.Pediatric radiology · 2022Article
- Fetal Neuroimaging Updates.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2021Review
- Quantitative analysis of fetal magnetic resonance phantoms and recommendations for an anthropomorphic motion phantom.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- Broad Learning EnhancedComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to a lack of fetal imaging coils, the standard commercial abdominal coil is often used for fetal imaging, the performance of which is limited by its insufficient coverage, element number, and Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this paper, a dedicated 36-channel coil array, of which size can best fit the body sizes of pregnancy gestation from 20 to 37+ weeks, was designed for fetal imaging at 3T. SNR with full phase encoding and G-factor denoted as noise amplification for parallel imaging were quantitatively evaluated by phantom studies. Compared with a commercial abdominal coil array, the proposed 36-channel fetal array provides not only SNR improvements in full phase encoding (with 10% in the region where the whole fetal body was located, and up to 40% in the edge region where the fetal brain and heart may appear) but also an augmented parallel imaging capability and remarkable SNR improvements at high acceleration factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.