ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2018
Regularization Analysis and Design for Prior-Image-Based X-Ray CT Reconstruction.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonstop gated cone-beam computed tomography for respiratory gating pancreatic cancer radiotherapy using dual-domain deep learning reconstruction.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Integrating CT image reconstruction, segmentation, and large language models for enhanced diagnostic insight.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Reconstruction of three-dimensional tomographic patient models for radiation dose modulation in CT from two scout views using deep learning.Medical physics · 2022Article
- A prior image constraint robust principal component analysis reconstruction method for sparse segmental multi-energy computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Prior-image-based CT reconstruction using attenuation-mismatched priors.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Direct reconstruction of anatomical change in low-dose lung nodule surveillance.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2021Article
- Deep-learning-based direct inversion for material decomposition.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Low dose cone-beam computed tomography reconstruction via hybrid prior contour based total variation regularization (hybrid-PCTV).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019Article
- Predicting image properties in penalized-likelihood reconstructions of flat-panel CBCT.Medical physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prior-image-based reconstruction (PIBR) methods have demonstrated great potential for radiation dose reduction in computed tomography applications. PIBR methods take advantage of shared anatomical information between sequential scans by incorporating a patient-specific prior image into the reconstruction objective function, often as a form of regularization. However, one major challenge with PIBR methods is how to optimally determine the prior image regularization strength which balances anatomical information from the prior image with data fitting to the current measurements. Too little prior information yields limited improvements over traditional model-based iterative reconstruction, while too much prior information can force anatomical features from the prior image not supported by the measurement data, concealing true anatomical changes. In this paper, we develop quantitative measures of the bias associated with PIBR. This bias exhibits as a fractional reconstructed contrast of the difference between the prior image and current anatomy, which is quite different from traditional reconstruction biases that are typically quantified in terms of spatial resolution or artifacts. We have derived an analytical relationship between the PIBR bias and prior image regularization strength and illustrated how this relationship can be used as a predictive tool to prospectively determine prior image regularization strength to admit specific kinds of anatomical change in the reconstruction. Because bias is dependent on local statistics, we further generalized shift-variant prior image penalties that permit uniform (shift invariant) admission of anatomical changes across the imaging field of view. We validated the mathematical framework in phantom studies and compared bias predictions with estimates based on brute force exhaustive evaluation using numerous iterative reconstructions across regularization values. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed analytical approach can predict the bias-regularization relationship accurately, allowing for prospective determination of the prior image regularization strength in PIBR. Thus, the proposed approach provides an important tool for controlling image quality of PIBR methods in a reliable, robust, and efficient fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.