Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29993658›Full record

ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics

Submodular Generalized Matching for Peptide Identification in Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Wenruo Bai, Jeffrey Bilmes, William S Noble

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenruo Bai
Jeffrey Bilmes
William S Noble

Funding

Machine learning analysis of tandem mass spectraR01GM096306 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NOBLE, WILLIAM STAFFORD · 2011 to 2014
$2.5M
BIGDATA: DA: Interpreting massive genomic data sets via summarizationR01CA180777 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NOBLE, WILLIAM STAFFORD · 2013 to 2015
$642k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA180777NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM096306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationIdentification of spectra produced by a shotgun proteomics mass spectrometry experiment is commonly performed by searching the observed spectra against a peptide database. The heart of this search procedure is a score function that evaluates the quality of a hypothesized match between an observed spectrum and a theoretical spectrum corresponding to a particular peptide sequence. Accordingly, the success of a spectrum analysis pipeline depends critically upon this peptide-spectrum score function. We develop peptide-spectrum score functions that compute the maximum value of a submodular function under $m$ m matroid constraints. We call this procedure a submodular generalized matching (SGM) since it generalizes bipartite matching. We use a greedy algorithm to compute maximization, which can achieve a solution whose objective is guaranteed to be at least $\frac{1}{1+m}$ 1 1 + m of the true optimum. The advantage of the SGM framework is that known long-range properties of experimental spectra can be modeled by designing suitable submodular functions and matroid constraints. Experiments on four data sets from various organisms and mass spectrometry platforms show that the SGM approach leads to significantly improved performance compared to several state-of-the-art methods. Supplementary information, C++ source code, and data sets can be found at https://melodi-lab.github.io/SGM.

Indexed as

Tandem Mass SpectrometryAlgorithmsAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCalibrationComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, StatisticalPeptidesPlasmodium falciparumProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSoftwarePeptides

Identifiers

PMID29993658
PMCPMC8641787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.