Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29993468›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2019

Separation of Subcutaneous Fat From Muscle in Surface Electrical Impedance Myography Measurements Using Model Component Analysis.

Hyeuknam Kwon, Wasim Q Malik, Seward B Rutkove, Benjamin Sanchez

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06491732 (Electrical Impedance Myography Via the Myolex mScan as an ALS Biomarker), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06491732 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Electrical Impedance Myography Via the Myolex mScan as an ALS Biomarker

TypeobservationalSponsorBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterRan2025 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisArmsElectrical Impedance Myography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Modeling and simulation of needle electrical impedance myography in nonhomogeneous isotropic skeletal muscle.IEEE journal of electromagnetics, RF and microwaves in medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Electrical impedance myography: A critical review and outlook.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Review
  4. In vivo muscle conduction study of the tongue using a multi-electrode tongue depressor.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Electrical Impedance Methods in Neuromuscular Assessment: An Overview.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hyeuknam Kwon
Wasim Q Malik
Seward B Rutkove
Benjamin Sanchez
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Next generation electrical impedance myography: the virtual muscle biopsyR01NS091159 · NINDS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Innovative Ultrasound Technology in Neuromuscular DiseaseK24NS060951 · NINDS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RUTKOVE, SEWARD B. · 2008 to 2017
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS K24 NS060951NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveElectrical impedance myography (EIM) is a relatively new technique to assess neuromuscular disorders (NMD). Although the application of EIM using surface electrodes (sEIM) has been adopted by the neurology community in recent years to evaluate NMD status, sEIM's sensitivity as a biomarker of skeletal muscle condition is impacted by subcutaneous fat (SF) tissue. Here, we develop a method that is able to remove the contribution of SF from sEIM data.

methodsWe evaluate independent component analysis (ICA) and principal component analysis (PCA) for this purpose. Then, we introduce the so-called model component analysis (MCA). All methods are validated with numerical simulations using impedivity data from SF and muscle tissues. The methods are then tested with measurements performed in diseased individuals ( n=3).

resultsSimulations demonstrate that MCA is the most accurate method at separating the impedivity of SF and muscle tissues with the accuracy being 99.2%, followed by ICA with 51.4%, and finally PCA with 38.5%. Experimental results from sEIM data measured on the triceps brachii of patients are consistent with muscle grayscale level values obtained using ultrasound imaging.

conclusionMCA can be used to separate the impedivity of SF and muscle tissues from sEIM data, thus increasing the sensitivity to detect changes in the muscle. SIGNIFICANCE: MCA can make the sEIM technique a better diagnostic tool and biomarker of disease progression and response to therapy by removing the confounding effect of SF tissue in NMD patients with excess subcutaneous fat tissue for any reason.

Indexed as

Electric ImpedanceAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalMyographyPrincipal Component AnalysisSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSubcutaneous Fat

Identifiers

PMID29993468
PMCPMC6357232
OpenAlexW2911799533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.